Hobart Corp. v. Waste Mgmt. of Ohio, Inc.

摘要

In sum, the narrow claims brought by Plaintiffs seek piecemeal relief as to the parties' underlying dispute. The claims necessarily, therefore, do not present the Court with an actual case or controversy and Article III jurisdiction is lacking. Because the Court finds jurisdiction is lacking the Court need not address OG&E's alternative request for dismissal on grounds Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Alternatively, the Court declines to exercise jurisdiction regarding the declaratory relief sought here.