首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter - Cases >Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. EPA
【24h】

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. EPA

机译:点击率生物多样性诉EPA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental group has standing to bring claims alleging that Environmental Protection Agency violated Section 7(a)(2) of Endangered Species Act by failing to conduct effects determination and consult with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service before registering cyantranilip-role as active ingredient in pesticides under Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, because: (1) groups have associational standing to bring claims on behalf of their members, (2) failure to conduct effects determination and consultation is procedural injury that can establish standing, (3) registration creates demonstrable risk to listed beetle and butterfly species, (4) failure to conduct determination or consultation is related to registration, and (5) group established connection between registration and alleged injury given pesticide toxicity to insects and overlap in species' critical habitats and expected use of pesticide.
机译:环保组织有权提出指控,指称环境保护局违反了《濒危物种法》第7(a)(2)条,因为在进行氰基氰胺角色注册前未能进行影响确定并与美国鱼类和野生动物服务局以及国家海洋渔业服务局进行了磋商。联邦杀虫剂,杀菌剂和杀鼠剂法中农药的有效成分,因为:(1)团体具有代表其成员提出主张的协会地位,(2)不进行效果确定和咨询是可以确立地位的程序伤害, (3)注册对列出的甲虫和蝴蝶物种造成明显的风险,(4)未进行确定或咨询与注册有关,(5)由于农药对昆虫的毒性和物种的重叠而在注册与所称伤害之间建立了联系。重要的栖息地和农药的预期使用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2017年第18期|1897-1914|共18页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号