首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy
【24h】

Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy

机译:评估废物收集管理:以意大利的大区域和城市为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of the present paper is to analyse the gap among Italian macroareas performances in terms of separate waste collection rate and density of separate waste collection. The aim is twofold: (1) to investigate if clear and effective infrastructure policies, in Southern Italy, have been realized that are able to reduce the gap in the separate waste collection process with the rest of Italy and (2) to evaluate if Southern Italian municipalities have improved their operational capacity in the separate waste collection process. In particular, we exploit data collected in 2012 by several Italian sources (ISPRA and ISTAT). We implement a recentered influence function regression technique that allows us to put two macro-areas in comparison (North vs. South and Centre vs. South). This technique, once measured the territorial gaps, allows to disentangle the gap in the two spatial units of analysis (at municipalities level and at macro-areas level). The estimates suggest that while in the North the issue of waste is managed effectively and responsibly with respect to the Southern area, the latter has exhibited an advantage with respect to the Central Italy; furthermore, Southern municipalities appear to be unable to pursue a virtuous waste management system generating the persistence of a marked territorial gap in terms of both SCR and DSC. The main policy implications are discussed.
机译:本文的目的是从单独的废物收集率和单独的废物收集密度方面分析意大利宏观区域绩效之间的差距。目的是双重的:(1)研究意大利南部是否已经制定了清晰有效的基础设施政策,从而能够减少意大利其他地区在单独的废物收集过程中的差距;(2)评价南部意大利市政当局在废物分类收集过程中提高了运营能力。特别是,我们利用了多个意大利来源(ISPRA和ISTAT)在2012年收集的数据。我们实施了一种最新的影响函数回归技术,该技术允许我们比较两个宏区域(北与南以及中与南)。这项技术一旦测量了领土差距,便可以在两个空间分析单位(市政当局级别和宏观区域级别)中解开差距。估计数表明,尽管在北部,相对于南部地区,废物问题得到了有效和负责任的管理,但相对于意大利中部,南部地区表现出优势;此外,南部市政当局似乎无法追求一种良性的废物管理系统,从而在SCR和DSC方面都存在明显的领土鸿沟。讨论了主要的政策含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号