首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Greenhouse gas emissions and cost assessments of municipal solid waste treatment and final disposal in Maputo City
【24h】

Greenhouse gas emissions and cost assessments of municipal solid waste treatment and final disposal in Maputo City

机译:马普托市温室气体排放及城市固体废物处理和最终处置的成本评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The goal in this study is to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the costs of municipal solid waste treatment and final disposal alternatives, in Maputo City, capital of Mozambique. Three scenarios were considered: first, the current practice of open dumping; second, the sole usage of sanitary landfilling; and third, comprising material recovery through recycling and biological treatment by composting or anaerobic digestion, and the usage of sanitary landfilling. The highest GHG emissions were observed in the second scenario with a released amount of 260,621t of CO2-eq/year, followed by the current scenario with 201,112t of CO2-eq/year. Both variants of the third scenario showed negative net emissions of -296,008t of CO2-eq/year and -223,925t of CO2-eq/year, due to the combination of GHG avoiding alternatives such as composting and biogas production as well as recycling. The cost assessment pointed towards the second scenario being the highest cost-saving scenario, requiring less than US$ 1 million/year and the current scenario as the most cost-intensive scenario, requiring around US$ 27 million/yearwith a contribution from the cost of inaction of US$ 24 million/year. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the waste compositing in relation to different income levels, which have verified the consistency of results. It also showed that with income increase in the future, GHG emissions will increase in the current and for the second scenario, while for the third scenario, the GHG emissions will reduce and the portion of recyclables will significantly increase.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估莫桑比克首都马普托市的温室气体排放以及城市固体废物处理和最终处置替代品的成本。考虑了以下三种情况:第一,目前的露天倾销做法;第二,卫生填埋的唯一用途;第三,包括通过循环利用和通过堆肥或厌氧消化进行生物处理来回收材料,以及使用卫生垃圾填埋场。在第二种情况下,温室气体排放量最高,释放量为260,621吨CO2当量/年,其次是当前情景下的201,112t CO2当量/年。第三种情况的两种变体均显示负净排放量为-296,008t CO2-eq /年和-223,925t CO2-eq /年,这是由于温室气体的组合避免了堆肥,沼气生产和回收等替代方案。成本评估指出,第二种方案是节省成本最高的方案,每年需要少于100万美元,而目前的方案是成本最高的方案,每年需要约2700万美元,费用中有一部分每年2400万美元的无作为。此外,通过改变不同收入水平的废物成分进行敏感性分析,这证实了结果的一致性。它还表明,随着未来收入的增加,在当前和第二种情况下,GHG排放量将增加,而在第三种情况下,GHG排放量将减少,可回收物的比例将显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号