首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: the case of Dutch provinces implementing the Spatial Planning Act
【24h】

Formal institutional change and informal institutional persistence: the case of Dutch provinces implementing the Spatial Planning Act

机译:正式的制度变革和非正式的制度持久性:以荷兰各省实施《空间规划法》为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conscious attempts to affect planning practice by reforming the statutory planning system are a common form of institutional design. Despite this, the effectiveness of institutional design as a strategy has not been sufficiently addressed in the planning literature. The Dutch case has been monitored thoroughly and provides a good opportunity to assess the extent to which the instruments introduced under the new legislation were used according to the stated intent of lawmakers. As the national level has largely devolved responsibility to provinces, these comprised the objects of study. The empirical evidence covering the 2008-11 period reveals remarkable variation between provinces in applying the law, including applications that run directly counter to the law's objectives. These findings point to the difficulty of institutional design in planning practice, and suggest that lawmakers should rethink their approach to influencing behaviour of planning agents.
机译:通过改革法定计划体系来有意识地影响计划实践的尝试是制度设计的一种常见形式。尽管如此,规划文献还没有充分说明制度设计作为一种策略的有效性。对该荷兰案进行了彻底的监督,并提供了一个很好的机会,可以根据议员提出的意图评估根据新立法引入的文书的使用程度。由于国家一级将责任主要下放给各省,因此这些构成了研究对象。涵盖2008-11年期间的经验证据表明,各省在适用法律方面存在显着差异,包括与法律目标直接背道而驰的申请。这些发现指出了在规划实践中进行制度设计的困难,并建议立法者应重新考虑其影响规划代理行为的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号