首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review
【24h】

Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review

机译:地域凝聚力,地域主义,地域性和软计划:批判性审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Territorial cohesion is a shared EU competence, but what is territory? This paper seeks to alert planners—in particular those involved in European spatial planning— that common-sense answers do not necessarily apply: it is not a container. A view of macrospace as filled with territories-as-containers—territorialism—is nonetheless the basis for common misunderstandings about the EU, and also about European planning, now being articulated in terms of territorial cohesion. Leaving the container view behind means that control over territories—territoriality—must be negotiated, something that relational regionalism also suggests. The planning literature is beginning to absorb such views, articulating soft rather than hard forms of planning for 'soft spaces'. Hard planning is bound to continue, but it will be embedded in new practices, including the conceptualisation of multiple visions on territory.
机译:领土凝聚力是欧盟的共同能力,但是什么是领土?本文旨在提醒规划人员,特别是那些参与欧洲空间规划的人员,不要常识性的答案:它不是容器。然而,充满着作为领土的容器(领土主义)的宏观空间的观点,是人们对欧盟以及对欧洲计划的普遍误解的基础,目前人们对这种错误理解是通过领土凝聚力来表达的。将容器的观点抛在后面意味着必须对领土的控制权进行谈判,这是关系区域主义所暗示的。规划文献开始吸收这种观点,阐明了“软空间”规划的软性而非硬性形式。艰苦的计划注定会继续,但是它将被嵌入到新的实践中,包括对领域的多种愿景的概念化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号