首页> 外文期刊>Environment and History >Going Bush: New Zealanders and Nature in the Twentieth Century AUP Studies in Social and Cultural History 5
【24h】

Going Bush: New Zealanders and Nature in the Twentieth Century AUP Studies in Social and Cultural History 5

机译:走向丛林:二十世纪的新西兰人与自然AUP社会文化史研究5

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

These are both well researched, well written books that define their topics imaginatively. Melissa Harper's book addresses the history of enjoying walking in the bush; Kirsty Ross's the connections between a society and its wilderness. Both books demonstrate delicious senses of irony and both authors main sufficient intellectual distance from their topics to write excellent histories. The parallels between these two books lie more in the approach taken by their authors than in their topics. Even the environments that they deal with, though both are called ' the bush', are very different. There is some overlap between the two books - both deal with what is known as hiking in North America, tramping in New Zealand, and bushwalking in Australia - but Harper focuses on this activity and what it exposes of a settler society's engagement with nature while Ross approaches the larger topic of a society's engagement with its natural environment directly.
机译:这些都是经过深入研究,写得很好的书,用想象的方式定义了它们的主题。梅利莎·哈珀(Melissa Harper)的书讲述了在丛林中漫步的历史。柯斯蒂·罗斯(Kirsty Ross)是社会与荒野之间的纽带。这两本书都表现出可笑的讽刺意味,并且两位作者与主题之间都具有足够的智力距离,可以撰写出色的历史。这两本书之间的相似之处更多地在于其作者所采用的方法而不是其主题。即使它们所处理的环境(尽管两者都被称为“丛林”)也大不相同。这两本书之间有些重叠-两者都涉及北美的徒步旅行,新西兰的流浪和澳大利亚的丛林徒步旅行-但哈珀着眼于这项活动,并揭示了定居者社会与自然的互动,而罗斯直接涉及社会与自然环境互动的更大主题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and History》 |2010年第1期|134-137|共4页
  • 作者

    CLAIRE BRENNAN;

  • 作者单位

    James Cook University, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号