首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Previewing Comments, EPA Water Trading Policy Draws Mixed Reaction
【24h】

Previewing Comments, EPA Water Trading Policy Draws Mixed Reaction

机译:前瞻性评论,EPA水贸易政策引起不同反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previewing written comments due Nov. 18, urban stormwater and agriculture officials are praising EPA efforts to encourage market-based approaches for addressing water quality through modifications of the agency's water quality trading policy while environmentalists are raising concerns about its lack of enforceability. The mixed reaction, made in public remarks at an Oct. 21 listening session at EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C., responds to EPA's September request for comment on several policy options to boost the use of water quality trading by making it easier for nonpoint sources of pollution to generate credits for sale. The floated policy options are an effort to further detail one of six principles outlined in a February policy memorandum to update the agency's 2003 water quality trading policy. EPA staff at the listening session said the agency is not looking to pick one of the many options for encouraging nonpoint source pollution reductions beyond the "baseline" identified in a total maximum daily load (TMDL). Instead, the agency is looking to see what options are supportable, with the intention that they could be used individually or in combination.
机译:在11月18日发布书面评论之前,城市雨水和农业官员对EPA的努力表示赞赏,他们鼓励通过基于市场的方法通过修改该机构的水质贸易政策来解决水质问题,而环保主义者则对其缺乏可执行性表示担忧。在10月21日在华盛顿特区EPA总部举行的一次听证会上,公众对此表示了不同的反应,这是对EPA于9月份提出的对几种政策选择发表评论的要求的回应,这些选择旨在通过简化非点源水的使用来促进水质贸易的使用。污染产生销售信用。浮动政策选项旨在进一步细化2月份政策备忘录中概述的六项原则之一,以更新该机构的2003年水质贸易政策。 EPA工作人员在听证会上说,该机构不打算选择鼓励非点源污染减少的多种方法之一,以减少总最大日负荷(TMDL)中确定的“基准”。相反,该机构正在寻找可以支持哪些选项,以便可以单独使用或组合使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号