...
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Comparison of the shell design methods for cylindrical liquid storage tanks
【24h】

Comparison of the shell design methods for cylindrical liquid storage tanks

机译:圆柱形储液罐壳体设计方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The three methods for determining the shell thickness of steel cylindrical liquid storage tanks designed in conformance with API Standard 650, Welded Tanks for Oil Storage (API 650) are: (1) one-foot method (1FM), (2) variable-design-point method (VDM) and (3) linear analysis. We compared the shell designs based on these three methods for different tank properties: diameter, height and allowable stress. For linear analysis, we developed a stiffness-flexibility matrix method based on thin shell theory that gives the theoretical displacements and stresses at each shell course without any approximation or simplification. Results show that shell designs using VDM may produce overstressed shell courses for some of the large steel liquid storage tanks when VDM is permissible to use. Linear analysis would give more accurate shell designs for those cases. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:确定根据API标准650设计的钢制圆筒形液体储罐罐壳厚度的三种方法:储油焊接罐(API 650):(1)单脚法(1FM),(2)可变设计点方法(VDM)和(3)线性分析。我们根据这三种方法针对不同的油箱特性(直径,高度和允许应力)比较了壳体设计。对于线性分析,我们基于薄壳理论开发了刚度-柔度矩阵方法,该方法给出了每个壳程的理论位移和应力,而无需进行任何近似或简化。结果表明,在允许使用VDM的情况下,使用VDM进行的壳体设计可能会为某些大型钢制液体储罐产生过应力的壳体走向。线性分析将为这些情况提供更准确的壳体设计。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号