首页> 外文期刊>The engineering economist >DIVERSIFICATION AS REAL OPTIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS ON FIRM-SPECIFIC RISK AND PERFORMANCE
【24h】

DIVERSIFICATION AS REAL OPTIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS ON FIRM-SPECIFIC RISK AND PERFORMANCE

机译:多元化作为现实的选择,对企业特定风险和绩效的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The management literature posits that firms can create value through diversification. In contrast, the established finance literature concludes that diversified firms destroy value. This paper suggests a way to reconcile these two warring camps by articulating a new theory of the way in which diversification can add value not by increasing performance, but by reducing risk in ways that investors cannot replicate. Specifically, diversification, understood dynamically, provides a way for companies competing in especially turbulent industries to hedge the competitive risk attendant to "convergence" phenomena. That is, in industries where the optimal operating scope of a firm is in question because the promise of convergence cannot be exploited using market-mediating mechanisms, firms will "over diversify" as a hedge against uncertain future reconfigurations of industry boundaries. In other words, these firms diversify as a way to create "real options" on future integration. These options create a form of "strategy insurance" that investors can not recreate with a portfolio of focused firms: investments in two separate, focused firms do not create an option on a single firm that encompasses the activities of those two companies. As uncertainty spawned of convergence begins to fade, strategically-hedged firms will re-focus their operations by exercising or abandoning their options on integration in a manner appropriate to the demands of their newly-defined marketplaces. Option-creating diversification has potentially profound implications on operating performance and risk profile. Most significantly, options-based diversification is asserted to cause the operating performance of such firms to fall as they diversify and increase as they focus, in keeping with the observations of the finance literature. Yet the firms will have created value for shareholders by compensating for significant strategic risks that investors cannot otherwise hedge.
机译:管理文献认为,企业可以通过多元化创造价值。相反,已有的金融文献得出的结论是,多元化的公司破坏了价值。本文提出了一种调和这两个交战阵营的方法,该方法阐明了一种多元化的新方法,即通过增加业绩而不是通过减少投资者无法复制的风险来增加价值,从而增加价值。具体而言,动态理解的多元化为企业提供了一种方式,使其在特别动荡的行业中竞争,以对冲“趋同”现象带来的竞争风险。就是说,在那些由于无法利用市场调节机制来发挥趋同前景而对企业的最佳经营范围产生疑问的行业中,企业将“过度多样化”,作为对付不确定的未来产业边界重新配置的对冲。换句话说,这些公司通过多元化发展,为未来的整合创造“实物期权”。这些选择创建了一种形式的“战略保险”,投资者无法使用重点公司的投资组合来重新创建:对两个独立的重点公司的投资不会在包含这两家公司活动的单个公司上创建期权。随着融合带来的不确定性开始消失,具有战略对冲功能的公司将通过以适合其新定义市场需求的方式行使或放弃其关于整合的选择,来重新调整业务重点。创造期权的多元化对运营绩效和风险状况具有潜在的深远影响。最重要的是,断言基于期权的多元化导致这种公司的经营业绩随着多元化而下降,而随着其专注而增长,这与金融文献的观察一致。然而,这些公司将通过补偿投资者原本无法对冲的重大战略风险,为股东创造价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号