...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Particle migration and blockage in geothermal reservoirs during water reinjection: Laboratory experiment and reaction kinetic model
【24h】

Particle migration and blockage in geothermal reservoirs during water reinjection: Laboratory experiment and reaction kinetic model

机译:热再升温过程中地热储层的颗粒迁移和阻塞:实验室实验与反应动力学模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During water reinjection in geothermal reservoirs, the risk of particle migration and blockage is often unavoidable, especially in the reservoirs with high mud content and poor consolidation. In this paper, a series of core flooding experiments using a sand-packed tube were conducted to evaluate the effects of water flow rate, sand grain composition, temperature, and confining pressure on the particle migration and blockage in reservoir. A novel reaction kinetic model was established to describe the process of particle migration and blockage in porous media. The results show that the movable particles in reservoir can be divided into fine particles (size<1/5 pore throat) and coarse particles (size between 1/5-1/2 pore throat), which can start to migrate successively as water flow rate increases. The fine particles can be produced out, while the coarse particles are likely to block the pore throat, making the permeability fluctuated and eventually decreased. The increase of coarse particle content, temperature and confining pressure can enhance the particle blockage risk in reservoir due to the great decline of the absolute permeability. The established reaction kinetic model of particle migration and blockage can be used to study the rock-fluid interactions during the geothermal water production and reinjection.
机译:在地热储层中再次再注时,粒子迁移和堵塞的风险通常是不可避免的,特别是在具有高泥浆含量和巩固差的储层中。本文采用了一系列使用砂包管的芯泛洪水实验,以评估水流速,砂粒组合物,温度和限制压力对储层中颗粒迁移和堵塞的影响。建立了一种新的反应动力学模型,描述了多孔介质中颗粒迁移和堵塞过程。结果表明,贮存器中可移动颗粒可分为细颗粒(尺寸<1/5孔喉)和粗颗粒(尺寸为1 / 5-1 / 2孔喉部),这可以开始作为水流动连续迁移速率增加。可以产生细颗粒,而粗颗粒可能阻断孔喉,使渗透率波动并最终降低。由于绝对渗透性的大幅下降,粗颗粒含量,温度和限制压力的增加可以增强储层中的粒子堵塞风险。颗粒迁移和堵塞的已建立的反应动力学模型可用于研究地热水生产和再注中的岩石流体相互作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2020年第1期|118234.1-118234.14|共14页
  • 作者单位

    School of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao 266580 China Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Cos Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)) Ministry of Education Qingdao 266580 China;

    School of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao 266580 China Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Cos Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)) Ministry of Education Qingdao 266580 China;

    School of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao 266580 China Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Cos Development (China University of Petroleum (East China)) Ministry of Education Qingdao 266580 China;

    Environmental Geological Exploration Bureau of Qinghai Province Xining 810007 China;

    Environmental Geological Exploration Bureau of Qinghai Province Xining 810007 China;

    Environmental Geological Exploration Bureau of Qinghai Province Xining 810007 China;

    Environmental Geological Exploration Bureau of Qinghai Province Xining 810007 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Geothermal water reinjection; Sand and clay particle migration; Blockage risk; Reaction kinetic model;

    机译:地热再再热;沙子和粘土颗粒迁移;堵塞风险;反应动力学模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号