首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >The impact of human behavior on ecological threshold: Positive or negative?—Grey relational analysis of ecological footprint, energy consumption and environmental protection
【24h】

The impact of human behavior on ecological threshold: Positive or negative?—Grey relational analysis of ecological footprint, energy consumption and environmental protection

机译:人类行为对生态阈值的影响:正面还是负面?-生态足迹,能源消耗和环境保护的灰色关联分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human behavior has the positive and negative impact on ecosystem. To study the interaction between ecosystem and behavior system, per-capita energy ecological footprint (EEF) is selected as the ecosystem threshold. Elasticity coefficient of environmental investment (ECE1) and elasticity coefficient of energy consumption (ECEC) represent the positive and negative human impact on ecosystem, respectively. It takes Shanghai, China as the empirical area to implement grey relational analysis of per-capita EEF (consist of coal, coke, fuel oil, and electricity), ECEC and ECEI from 1978 to 2010. The grey correlation coefficients show that negative behavior of energy consumption has the closer influence on the ecosystem than positive behavior of environmental protection. Electricity is the most significant factor of the energy consumption and the highest sensitive indicator to the environmental capital input-output. From the perspective of government policy, "energy saving" is more efficient than "emission reduction". Reducing the negative activities is imminent in the current process of development
机译:人类行为对生态系统具有正面和负面影响。为了研究生态系统与行为系统之间的相互作用,选择人均能源生态足迹(EEF)作为生态系统阈值。环境投资弹性系数(ECE1)和能源消耗弹性系数(ECEC)分别代表人类对生态系统的正面和负面影响。以人均EEF(由煤,焦炭,燃料油和电力组成),ECEC和ECEI的1978年至2010年之间的灰色关联分析作为中国的经验区域。灰色关联系数表明,能源消耗对生态系统的影响远大于环境保护的积极行为。电力是能源消耗的最重要因素,也是对环境资本投入产出的最高敏感指标。从政府政策的角度来看,“节能”比“减排”更为有效。在当前的发展过程中,减少负面活动迫在眉睫

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号