首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: A Well-to-Wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation
【24h】

Environmental and economic analysis of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for heavy goods vehicles in the UK: A Well-to-Wheel and total cost of ownership evaluation

机译:英国重型货车的液化天然气(LNG)的环境和经济分析:轮毂和总拥有成本评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper evaluates the environmental and economic performance of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a transition fuel to replace diesel in heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). A Well-to-Wheel (WTW) assessment based on real-world HGV drive cycles is performed to determine the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with LNG relative to diesel. The analysis is complemented with a probabilistic approach to determine the total cost of ownership (TCO) across a range of scenarios. The methodologies are validated via a case study of vehicles operating in the UK, using data provided by a large food retailer. The spark-ignited LNG vehicles under study were observed to be 18% less energy efficient than their diesel counterparts, leading to a 7% increase in WTW GHG emissions. However, a reduction of up to 13% is feasible if LNG vehicles reach parity efficiency with diesel. Refuelling at publicly available stations enabled a 7% TCO saving in the nominal case, while development of private infrastructure incurred net costs. The findings of this study highlight that GHG emission reductions from LNG HGVs will only be realised if there are vehicle efficiency improvements, while the financial case for operators is positive only if a publicly accessible refuelling network is available.
机译:本文评估了液化天然气(LNG)作为过渡燃料替代重型货车(HGV)中的柴油的环境和经济性能。进行了基于实际HGV行驶周期的轮对(WTW)评估,以确定与LNG相关的柴油相关生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放。该分析辅以概率方法来确定各种情况下的总拥有成本(TCO)。通过使用大型食品零售商提供的数据,通过对在英国运营的车辆进行的案例研究验证了该方法。据观察,研究中的火花点火式LNG车辆的能源效率比柴油车辆低18%,导致WTW温室气体排放量增加了7%。但是,如果LNG车辆与柴油达到同等效率,则最多可减少13%。在正常情况下,在公共站点加油可节省7%的TCO,而私有基础设施的开发则产生了净成本。这项研究的结果强调,只有提高车辆效率,才能实现LNG HGV减少温室气体排放,而运营者的财务状况只有在可以使用公共加油网络的情况下才是积极的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2020年第2期|111161.1-111161.15|共15页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Imperial Coll London Dept Mech Engn London SW7 2AZ England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Civil & Environm Engn Ctr Transport Studies London SW7 2AZ England;

    Imperial Coll London Dept Chem Engn London SW7 2AZ England;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Alternative fuels; Greenhouse gas emissions; Heavy goods vehicles; Liquefied natural gas; Total cost of ownership;

    机译:替代燃料;温室气体排放;重型货车;液化天然气;总拥有成本;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号