首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 3. Direct Comparison on the PM Removal Efficiency of Electrostatic Precipitators and Fabric Filters
【24h】

Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 3. Direct Comparison on the PM Removal Efficiency of Electrostatic Precipitators and Fabric Filters

机译:燃煤电厂PM2.5排放和去除的现场测量:3.直接比较静电除尘器和织物过滤器的PM去除效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This contribution reports direct comparison of the particulate matter (PM) removal efficiencies of electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) and fabric filters (FFs) installed in two 300 MW coal-fired power station units that are equipped with identical boilers and DeNO(x) units. Field PM measurements were carried out at the horizontal ducts at the inlets of the DeNO(x) units, as well as the inlets and outlets of the two dust collectors when the two boilers burned the same coal under identical combustion conditions. The PM and total fly ash were collected via a low-pressure impactor (LPI) and/or a smoke analyzer. The collected samples were then subjected to analysis for chemical composition and morphology using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) probe and a field emission scanning microscope with an energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer (FESEM-EDX). The results show that both the ESPs and the FFs can effectively capture PM, with a PM2.5 collection efficiency of 99.63% and 99.95%, respectively. For the PM with similar properties, the collection efficiencies in the FFs are only marginally higher than those in the ESPs. The most notable discrepancies between the fractional PM removal efficiencies of ESPs and FFs are observed for PM in the size range 0.32 mu m. The PM removal performance of both the ESPs and the FFs is related to particle size. At 0.3-2 mu m, the performance of the ESPs is more sensitive to particle size than the FFs. The PM collection efficiency of the FFs is inversely related to particle size, and the capture of PM around 0.4 mu m is slightly weak, most likely due to the transition of capture mechanisms from impaction to Brownian diffusion.
机译:该贡献报告直接比较了安装在两个装有相同锅炉和DeNO(x)单元的300 MW燃煤电站机组中的静电除尘器(ESP)和织物过滤器(FFs)去除颗粒物(PM)的效率。当两台锅炉在相同的燃烧条件下燃烧相同的煤时,在DeNO(x)单元入口处的水平管道以及两个集尘器的入口和出口处进行现场PM测量。通过低压冲击器(LPI)和/或烟雾分析仪收集PM和总粉煤灰。然后使用X射线荧光(XRF)探针和带有能量色散X射线分析仪(FESEM-EDX)的场发射扫描显微镜对收集的样品进行化学成分和形态分析。结果表明,ESP和FF均可有效捕获PM,其PM2.5收集效率分别为99.63%和99.95%。对于具有类似特性的PM,FF中的收集效率仅略高于ESP中的收集效率。对于尺寸范围为0.32μm的PM,ESP和FF的PM去除效率的分数之间最明显的差异。 ESP和FF的PM去除性能与粒径有关。在0.3-2微米时,ESP的性能比FFs对粒度更敏感。 FFs的PM收集效率与粒径成反比,0.4μm左右的PM捕集能力略弱,最有可能是由于捕集机制从撞击扩散到布朗扩散的过渡。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2016年第julaspeca期|5930-5936|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China;

    Guangdong Power Grid Corp, Elect Power Res Inst, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Murdoch Univ, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Discipline Elect Engn Energy & Phys, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号