首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Life Cycle Analysis of Natural Gas-Fired Distributed Combined Heat and Power versus Centralized Power Plant
【24h】

Life Cycle Analysis of Natural Gas-Fired Distributed Combined Heat and Power versus Centralized Power Plant

机译:天然气分布式热电联产与集中式电厂的生命周期分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When investing in new power plants, life-cycle benefits of these plants, particularly in regards to environmental emissions is becoming a growing concern. With a variety of new technologies coming online that can serve power loads, it is key to have the tools available to conduct a full scale life-cycle analysis of different power systems. This paper moves the research forward by providing an improved methodology to compare a traditional natural gas combined cycle plant (NGCC) with a distributed energy resource combined heat and power (CHP) system The goal of this study is to quantify the environmental profile of electricity provided by a 555 MW NGCC power plant compared to 1-20 MW gas turbine-based CHP plants with displaced heat credits, when those systems meet the equivalent power demand of 1 MVVh delivered to the end user. Cradle-to gate life cycle assessment/analysis (LCA) models of NGCC and distributed natural gas fired CHP are developed to compare the life cycle (LC) emissions. This study is based on public national mix data in the U.S., guaranteeing the results are producible. It is an initial attempt to quantify environmental differences between the centralized NGCC system and distributed CHP generation, as our developed LCA methodology overcomes the challenges of coproduct system and scale-up by using fundamental and transferable estimation methods. Hypothetically adjusted "displaced heat" from the CHP is used to calculate emissions credits to the system. Power law and input output model are used to compare between power systems with a large capacity gap, which is from 1 to 555 MW in this study. The calculated emissions of 557 kg CO2e/M-Wh (without displaced heat credits) is verified within the range of previous harmonized review of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Non-GHG (i.e., Hg, Pb, etc.) results highlight emissions resulting from the construction, commissioning/decommissioning of displaced boilers as the key parameters in respect to environmental performance of CHP.
机译:当投资于新的发电厂时,这些发电厂的生命周期收益,尤其是在环境排放方面的收益日益受到关注。随着各种可以为电力负载提供服务的新技术上线,拥有可用于对不同电力系统进行全面生命周期分析的工具至关重要。本文通过提供一种改进的方法来将传统的天然气联合循环发电厂(NGCC)与分布式能源联合热电联产(CHP)系统进行比较,从而推动研究的发展。本研究的目的是量化所提供的电力的环境状况当这些系统满足交付给最终用户的1 MVVh的等效电力需求时,则由555 MW NGCC电厂与1-20 MW燃气轮机的热电联产电厂进行比较。开发了NGCC的从摇篮到大门的生命周期评估/分析(LCA)模型和分布式天然气CHP,以比较生命周期(LC)排放。这项研究基于美国的国家公共混合数据,以确保结果可生产。这是对集中式NGCC系统与分布式CHP生成之间的环境差异进行量化的初步尝试,因为我们开发的LCA方法通过使用基本和可转移的估算方法克服了副产品系统和规模扩大的挑战。从热电联产中经过假设调整的“排热”用于计算系统的排放信用。功率定律和输入输出模型用于比较容量差距较大的电力系统,在本研究中该容量差距为1至555 MW。在先前的温室气体(GHG)排放量协调审查范围内,对计算得出的557千克CO2e / M-Wh排放量(无热学分)进行了验证。非GHG(即Hg,Pb等)结果突出显示了置换锅炉的建造,调试/退役产生的排放,这是CHP环保性能的关键参数。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2018年第11期|11731-11741|共11页
  • 作者

    Meng Fanxu; Dillingham Gavin;

  • 作者单位

    Houston Adv Res Ctr, 8801 Gosling Rd, The Woodlands, TX 77381 USA;

    Houston Adv Res Ctr, 8801 Gosling Rd, The Woodlands, TX 77381 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号