首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >E-books access models: an analytical comparative study
【24h】

E-books access models: an analytical comparative study

机译:电子书访问模型:分析比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Though electronic books (e-books) are not new, they are slow in their uptake compared to other types of e-publications such as journals, newspapers. The possible reasons for this could be because the technology for creating/accessing e-books(both hardware and software) is not yet matured. However, the recent involvement of many commercial publishers and aggregators in publishing and marketing of e-books has triggered their use. This trend suggests making an analytical comparative study ofthe e-book access model. The main purpose of this study is to analyse and compare offline and online e-book access models. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper an attempt is made to analyse and compare three offline and three online e-book accessmodels by identifying various specific e-book access model features. The access models are evaluated based on three-point scale. Findings - It is observed that among offline access models Microsoft Reader has most of the features well defined and among online access models, Ebrary has most of the features well defined. Originality/value - Many publishers and aggregators have started producing and marketing e-books using different types of access models. There are several access models available and eachone has its own merits and demerits. However, there has been no study carried out in comparing and analyzing these models. Hence this study is useful for all the stakeholders of e-book industry viz., creator (author), publisher, aggregator, librarians and users of e-books.
机译:目的-尽管电子书(e-books)并不是新事物,但与其他类型的电子出版物(例如期刊,报纸)相比,它们的吸收速度较慢。造成这种情况的可能原因是,用于创建/访问电子书(硬件和软件)的技术尚未成熟。但是,最近许多商业出版商和聚合商参与了电子书的出版和营销,从而触发了它们的使用。这种趋势表明需要对电子书访问模型进行分析比较研究。这项研究的主要目的是分析和比较离线和在线电子书访问模型。设计/方法/方法-本文试图通过识别各种特定的电子书访问模型功能来分析和比较三种离线和三种在线电子书访问模型。访问模型基于三点量表进行评估。发现-发现,在脱机访问模型中,Microsoft Reader具有定义良好的大多数功能,而在在线访问模型中,Ebrary具有定义良好的大多数功能。原创性/价值-许​​多出版商和整合商已开始使用不同类型的访问模型来生产和营销电子书。有几种访问模式可用,每个人都有其优点和缺点。但是,尚未进行比较和分析这些模型的研究。因此,本研究对电子书行业的所有利益相关者,电子书的创建者(作者),出版者,汇集者,图书馆员和用户都是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号