首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility >Performance of the European Lightning Detection Network EUCLID in Case of Various Types of Current Pulses From Upward Lightning Measured at the Peissenberg Tower
【24h】

Performance of the European Lightning Detection Network EUCLID in Case of Various Types of Current Pulses From Upward Lightning Measured at the Peissenberg Tower

机译:在Peissenberg塔测量的各种类型的电流脉冲的情况下,欧洲避雷检测网络Euclid的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we present current pulses from upward lightning, which have been measured since 2011 at the new top structure of the Peissenberg Tower, Germany. The study comprises 38 negative and two positive flashes, which contained 199 current pulses. About 49 of them were return stroke current pulses, 133 of them were current pulses, which superimposed the initial continuous current (ICC-pulses), and 17 of them were M-component current pulses, which superimposed the continuing current of a preceding return stroke. The current pulses are used to evaluate the performance of the European lightning location system EUCLID. Fifty one (25.6%) out of the 199 current pulses were detected by EUCLID, 40 (81.6%) return stroke current pulses, and 11 (8.5%) ICC-pulses or M-component current pulses. The peak currents ranged from 0.1 to 40.8 kA. Two groups of current pulses could be identified. The first group is related to branches of nearby downward lightning which got in contact with the tower. Therefore, EUCLID reported much higher peak currents (more than 100%) compared to the peak currents measured at the Peissenberg Tower. The first group comprises the total of nine current pulses (six ICC-pulses, three return stroke current pulses). The second group of current pulses is related to upward lightning initiated from the top of the tower. The peak current inferred from EUCLID deviates much less from peak current measured at the Peissenberg Tower. The peak current was overestimated by about 20% by EUCLID. The second group comprises the total of 42 current pulses (4 ICC-pulses, 1 M-component current pulses, and 37 return stroke current pulses). The peak currents ranged from 3.1 to 40.8 kA, the geometric mean (GM) was 9.4 kA. About 30% of these events were misclassified as intra-cloud pulses by EUCLID. The GM of the location error was 161 m for all events, and 132 m considering only the return stroke current pulses.
机译:在本文中,我们从2011年以来展示了向上闪电的电流脉冲,以来在德国Peissenberg塔的新顶级结构上被衡量。该研究包括38个阴性和两个正闪光,其包含199个电流脉冲。其中大约49个是返回行程电流脉冲,其中133个是电流脉冲,其叠加初始连续电流(ICC-脉冲),其中17个是M组件电流脉冲,其叠加了前返回行程的继续电流。目前的脉冲用于评估欧洲闪电定位系统EUCLID的性能。通过EuclID,40个(81.6%)返回行程电流脉冲和11(8.5%)ICC脉冲或M组件电流脉冲,检测为199个电流脉冲中的五十一(25.6%)。峰值电流范围为0.1至40.8ka。可以识别两组电流脉冲。第一组与附近的向下闪电的分支有关,该分支与塔接触。因此,与Peissenberg塔测量的峰值电流相比,Euclid报告了更高的峰值电流(超过100%)。第一组包括九个电流脉冲(六个ICC-脉冲,三个返回行程电流脉冲)。第二组电流脉冲与从塔顶开始的向上闪电有关。从EuclID推断的峰值电流从Peissenberg塔测量的峰值电流偏离得多。峰值电流通过EuclID升高约20%。第二组包括总共42个电流脉冲(4个ICC-脉冲,1M元件电流脉冲和37个返回行程电流脉冲)。峰值电流范围为3.1至40.8ka,几何平均值(gm)为9.4 ka。大约30%的这些事件被EuclID被逐渐被切错了。所有事件的位置误差的GM为161米,并且仅考虑返回行程电流脉冲的132米。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号