首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >'EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE' IN THE CLASSROOM? AN ARISTOTELIAN CRITIQUE
【24h】

'EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE' IN THE CLASSROOM? AN ARISTOTELIAN CRITIQUE

机译:教室里的“情商”? ARISTOTELIAN批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent trend in moral education, social and emotional learning, incorporates the mantra of emotional intelligence (EI) as a key element in an extensive program of character building. In making his famous claim that the good life would have to include appropriate emotions, Aristotle obviously considered the schooling of emotions to be an indispensable part of moral education. However, in this essay Kristjan Kristjansson casts doubt on the assumption that Aristotelians should approve of the clarion call for EI, as understood by Daniel Goleman and the proponents of social and emotional learning, in the classroom. Various marked differences between EI and Aristotelian emotional virtue are highlighted and explored. Kristjansson argues that the claims of EI lack moral ballast and that when this fact is added to an existing heap of educational problems attached to the implementation of EI programs, educators had better rethink their reliance on EI as a model of emotion cultivation, and perhaps revert to the teachings of Aristotle himself.
机译:德育,社会和情感学习的最新趋势将情感智力(EI)的口头禅纳入了广泛的性格培养计划中。亚里斯多德(Aristotle)提出了一个著名的主张,即美好的生活必须包含适当的情感,他显然认为情感教育是德育必不可少的一部分。但是,在这篇文章中,克里斯蒂安·克里斯蒂安森(Kristjan Kristjansson)对亚里士多德主义者应该批准在课堂上要求EI的号召性声明提出了怀疑,正如丹尼尔·戈尔曼(Daniel Goleman)和社会与情感学习的支持者所理解的那样。突出并探讨了EI和亚里士多德的情感美德之间的各种显着差异。克里斯蒂安森(Kristjansson)辩称,对EI的主张缺乏道德上的支持,当将这一事实加到与实施EI项目相关的大量教育问题中时,教育者们最好重新考虑他们对EI的依赖,这是情感培养的一种模式,也许还可以亚里士多德本人的教s。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号