首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >SCHEFFLER AND THE COGNITIVE ENDS OF TEACHING
【24h】

SCHEFFLER AND THE COGNITIVE ENDS OF TEACHING

机译:舍夫勒和教学的目的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Schefflerian notion that teaching intentionally tries to bring about knowledge has been spiritedly challenged by Catherine Elgin. Perhaps, in light of our enlightened understanding of the limits of our claims to knowledge in the scientific realm, knowledge emerges as too ambitious a goal for teaching to set itself. In this essay, George Pollack explores the maneuvers Israel Scheffler employs to deflect the onslaught of this challenge. Pollack addresses this issue by examining the so-called rationality constraints on teaching championed by Scheffler. The thesis that these constraints are definitive of teaching is, the author argues, not arrived at on conceptual grounds, but draws for its support on the several strands of epistemological reasoning woven together in Scheffler's celebrated work, Conditions of Knowledge. The notion of a dynamically engaged-in teacher-pupil interaction, harnessed to a mutually shared system of beliefs, is shown to take on a heightened prominence.
机译:凯瑟琳·埃尔金(Satherine Elgin)强烈挑战了舍弗勒式的思想,即有意进行教学以带来知识。也许,鉴于我们对科学领域中对知识的主张的局限性有了开明的理解,因此,知识的出现过于雄心勃勃,成为教学无法立足的目标。在这篇文章中,乔治·波拉克(George Pollack)探索了以色列·舍弗勒(Israel Scheffler)为克服这一挑战而采取的策略。 Pollack通过研究由舍弗勒(Scheffler)倡导的所谓的合理性约束来解决这个问题。作者认为,这些约束是教学的确定性论据并非出于概念上的考虑,而是在舍弗勒著名的著作《知识的条件》中融合了几条认识论推理的支持。通过相互共享的信念体系,动态参与的教师与学生互动的概念显示出了更高的知名度。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2008年第2期|p.229-248|共20页
  • 作者

    George Pollack;

  • 作者单位

    C.W. Post Campus Long Island University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号