首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Education >Assessing the Impact of Reflective Activities in Digital and Analog Electronics Courses
【24h】

Assessing the Impact of Reflective Activities in Digital and Analog Electronics Courses

机译:评估反射活动在数字和模拟电子课程中的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contribution: This paper demonstrates positive outcomes from reflection-on-action by engineering students, including meaningful insights on their performance, professional and academic practices, and design knowledge as well as promising preliminary exam results.Background: Literature from the engineering education community underlines the benefits of reflection-based upon theories, such as Experiential Learning Theory, and calls for additional use of reflection in engineering education and associated scholarly work.Intended Outcomes: The authors intended for students to obtain meaningful academic and professional insights with implications for their future performance and to perform better on subsequent related exams via reflection.Application Design: Post-quiz and post-design reflective exercises were implemented in two electrical and computer engineering courses, Microelectronic Circuits and Advanced Digital Design, to drive student analysis of differences between their designs or calculations and the "standard solution" using simulation software and question prompts. Reflection-on-action was chosen to enhance students' post-activity understanding and insight, as ultimate learning requires reflection whereby students identify errors and strategies for improvement.Findings: Results demonstrated the value of reflection-on-action using post-activity comparisons and simulation. The students' reflective content and interviews demonstrated substantial professional and academic insights from and appreciation for reflection. On the Microelectronics final exam, a medium effect was associated with the reflection, and for the Digital Design exam, the effect was small to medium. Differences in depth levels of the students' reflections associated with the two types of problems (quiz questions versus design) were evident, suggesting problem type may impact depth.
机译:贡献:本文展示了工程专业学生对行为的反思所产生的积极成果,包括对他们的表现,专业和学术实践,设计知识以及有希望的初步考试结果的有意义的见解。背景:工程学教育界的文献强调了这一点。反思的好处基于经验学习理论等理论,并要求在工程教育和相关的学术工作中更多地使用反思。预期结果:作者旨在让学生获得有意义的学术和专业见解,对他们的未来表现有影响应用设计:在两个电子和计算机工程课程(微电子电路和高级数字设计)中实施了测验和设计后的反思练习,以推动学生对设计之间的差异进行分析。 C计算和使用模拟软件和问题提示的“标准解决方案”。行动反思被选择来增强学生对活动后理解和见解的能力,因为最终学习需要反思,从而学生可以识别错误和改进策略。模拟。学生的反思性内容和访谈表明,他们从反思中获得了实质性的专业和学术见解,并对此表示赞赏。在微电子学期末考试中,反射与中等程度的影响有关,而对于数字设计考试,其影响是中小程度的。与两种类型的问题(测验问题与设计)相关的学生思考的深度层次上的差异是明显的,这表明问题类型可能会影响深度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号