首页> 外文期刊>Education, IEEE Transactions on >Conceptual Gaps in Circuits Textbooks: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Conceptual Gaps in Circuits Textbooks: A Comparative Study

机译:电路教科书中的概念空白:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many university-level electrical engineering courses continue to use textbooks as curriculum scaffolds, prescribed texts, and/or reference volumes. Textbook reliance is even more pronounced in courses that teach foundational principles of the discipline, such as introductory circuit theory. This paper reports on the conceptual coverage of introductory electric circuit theory as presented in textbooks. More specifically, a comparative study of six texts was performed using an analytic framework based on prior research on conceptual understanding and organized around multiple criteria. The ideas of conceptual framework and conceptual links are used to identify potential conceptual gaps in each textbook. This analysis reveals that the majority of the books are missing many important conceptual features. Findings from this study can be beneficial for authors as they develop new editions of books, and for instructors as they evaluate and select texts for use in their courses. This study can also inform ongoing efforts to both develop more effective instructional materials and investigate how textbooks affect conceptual understanding.
机译:许多大学水平的电气工程课程继续使用教科书作为课程的支架,规定的教科书和/或参考书。在讲授该学科的基本原理(例如电路原理入门)的课程中,教科书的依赖性更加明显。本文报告了教科书中介绍的入门电路理论的概念。更具体地说,使用基于先前对概念理解的研究并围绕多个标准进行组织的分析框架,对六个文本进行了比较研究。概念框架和概念链接的思想用于识别每本教科书中潜在的概念空白。这种分析表明,大多数书籍都缺少许多重要的概念特征。这项研究的发现对作者开发新版书籍或指导教师评估和选择课本中使用的教科书都是有益的。这项研究还可以为正在进行的工作提供信息,以开发更有效的教学材料,并调查教科书如何影响概念理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号