【24h】

DocAdvisor

机译:DocAdvisor

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When a patient in Illinois did not like the result of her breast-augmentation surgery, she reacted like many dissatisfied customers: by writing negative comments about her doctor on websites that feature such reviews. Her breasts, she said, looked like something out of a horror movie. Other unhappy patients joined her online, calling the doctor "dangerous", "horrible" and a "jackass". He sued them for defamation. (The cases were later dropped.) Other doctors have filed similar lawsuits, mostly in America. Though few have won, their reaction illustrates a discomfort with patient reviews felt by many of their colleagues. Some question the accuracy and relevance of the feedback; others complain that privacy rules prevent them from responding. Sites often have just a handful of ratings per doctor, meaning results can be skewed by a single bad write-up.
机译:当伊利诺伊州的患者不喜欢隆胸手术的结果时,她的反应就像许多不满意的顾客一样:在带有此类评论的网站上写下有关她的医生的负面评论。她说,她的乳房看起来像恐怖电影中的东西。其他不开心的患者也加入了她的行列,称医生为“危险”,“可怕”和“笨蛋”。他起诉他们诽谤。 (案件后来撤消了。)其他医生也提起了类似的诉讼,主要在美国。尽管很少有人获胜,但他们的反应说明他们的许多同事对患者的评论感到不适。有人质疑反馈的准确性和相关性;其他人则抱怨说隐私规则阻止他们做出回应。网站通常每位医生的评分很少,这意味着结果可能会因一次不良的撰写而歪曲。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2014年第8897期|47-47|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号