首页> 外文期刊>The economist >The tech antitrust paradox
【24h】

The tech antitrust paradox

机译:技术反托拉斯悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ONE OF THE few things that most people in the West agree on is that there is some kind of problem with the big tech firms. Here is a list of common complaints. They have high market shares and concentrated ownership so that tycoons mainly benefit from their growth, cause addiction, censor free speech, do not censor free speech, are infiltrated by Russian spies, suck up to Chinese autocrats, do not pay customers for their data, give private data to third parties, refuse to give data to third parties, don't invest much, bully their critics, underpay workers, poach too many experts from universities, pay too little tax and corrupt politics. Some of these are directly about competition. In other cases the link is tangential. For example, if customers had good alternatives perhaps they would switch from today's firms when the companies behave badly. Often there is no link to competition at all.
机译:西方大多数人都同意的几件事之一是,大型科技公司存在某种问题。以下是常见的投诉清单。他们拥有较高的市场份额和所有权集中度,因此大亨主要受益于他们的成长,引起上瘾,审查言论自由,不审查言论自由,被俄罗斯间谍渗透,吸纳中国独裁者,不向客户支付数据费用,将私人数据提供给第三方,拒绝将数据提供给第三方,不要投入太多,欺负批评者,欠薪,从大学挖走过多的专家,缴纳很少的税款和腐败的政治。其中一些直接与竞争有关。在其他情况下,链接是切线的。例如,如果客户有很好的选择,那么当公司表现不佳时,他们可能会从今天的公司中撤出。通常,竞争根本没有联系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2018年第9118期|a6-a8|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号