...
首页> 外文期刊>Economic Development Quarterly: The Journal of American Economic Revitalization >Does Tax Increment Financing Pass the 'But-for' Test in Missouri?
【24h】

Does Tax Increment Financing Pass the 'But-for' Test in Missouri?

机译:税收增量融资是否通过了密苏里州的“但”测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of tax increment financing (TIF) remains a popular, yet highly controversial, tool among policy makers in their efforts to promote economic development. This study conducts a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of Missouri's TIF program, specifically in Kansas City and St. Louis, in creating economic opportunities. We build a time-series data set starting 1990 through 2012 of detailed employment levels, establishment counts, and sales at the census block-group level to run a set of difference-in-differences with matching estimates for the impact of TIF at the local level. Although we analyze the impact of TIF on a wide set of indicators and across various industry sectors, we find no conclusive evidence that the TIF program in either city has a causal impact on key economic development indicators.
机译:在政策制定者促进经济发展的努力中,税收增加融资(TIF)的使用仍然是一种流行但极富争议的工具。这项研究对密苏里州的TIF计划(特别是在堪萨斯城和圣路易斯)创造经济机会的有效性进行了全面评估。我们建立了一个从1990年到2012年的时间序列数据集,其中包括详细的就业水平,机构数量和人口普查小组水平的销售情况,以得出一系列差异,并与当地TIF的影响估算值相匹配。水平。尽管我们分析了TIF对广泛指标以及跨各个行业的影响,但我们没有确凿证据表明这两个城市的TIF计划对关键的经济发展指标都有因果关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号