首页> 外文期刊>Ecological research >Seed dispersal of Korean pine Pinus koraiensis labeled by two different tags in a northern temperate forest, northeast China
【24h】

Seed dispersal of Korean pine Pinus koraiensis labeled by two different tags in a northern temperate forest, northeast China

机译:在中国东北温带森林中用两种不同标签标记的红松松树种子扩散

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two types of tagging methods, i.e., a 1 × 3-cm tin tag attached to seed with a 10- to 12-cm metal wire (total weight 0.32 g) and a 2 × 4-cm white plastic tag fastened to seed with an identical metal wire (total weight 0.57 g) were used to study their effects on seed dispersal of Korean pine by small rodents. A total of 600 seeds were released to assess four main points: (1) difference in seed survival rates, (2) difference in caching behaviors of small rodents, (3) difference in dispersal distances, and (4) proportion of seed missing. The results demonstrated that seed removal for wire-plastic-tagged seeds was faster than that for wire-tin-tagged seeds. There was no apparent difference in the proportion of seeds eaten in situ (42% and 52% for wire-plastic-tagged seeds and wire-tin-tagged seeds, respectively). We found 41% and 1% of seeds were moved and hoarded for wire-plastic-tagged seeds and wire-tin-tagged seeds, respectively. However, 2.33% and 14% of seeds were missing, and their ultimate fates were not known for wire-plastic-tagged seeds and wire-tin-tagged seeds, respectively. We found the wire-plastic-tagged seeds easier to track than the wire-tin-tagged seeds due to the fact that the white plastic tags were more salient than the tin tags in field environments. The average dispersal distances were 4.11 ± 2.40 m and 3.01 ± 2.06 m for wire-plastic-tagged seeds and wire-tin-tagged seeds, respectively, and showed great difference. Despite most being eaten in situ or after removal, 41% of seeds were cached for wire-plastic-tagged seeds, much more than for wire-tin-tagged seeds. A total of 71 primary caches (123 seeds) were found for wire-plastic-tagged seeds, with the average and maximum cache sizes being 1.73 and 6, respectively. However, only three caches were found, and cache size was equal to one for wire-tin-tagged seeds. The above data suggests there is some uncertainty in different tagging methods to used track seed fates. Despite their effectiveness in helping to trace seed dispersal or movement by seed-dispersing rodents, different tagging methods-including size, color, and mass--need to be fully understand in enclosure experiments.
机译:两种标记方法,即用10至12厘米的金属线(总重0.32克)将1×3厘米的锡标签附着到种子上,并用2毫米4厘米的白色塑料标签固定到种子上。用相同的金属丝(总重0.57 g)研究它们对小啮齿动物对红松种子传播的影响。总共释放了600颗种子,以评估四个要点:(1)种子存活率的差异;(2)小啮齿动物的缓存行为的差异;(3)分散距离的差异;(4)种子丢失的比例。结果表明,带有金属丝标签的种子的种子去除速度比带有金属丝标签的种子的去除速度更快。原位食用种子的比例没有明显差异(金属丝标签种子和金属锡标签种子分别占42%和52%)。我们发现分别有41%和1%的种子被移动和ho积为金属丝标签种子和金属锡标签种子。但是,缺少2.33%和14%的种子,而金属丝标签种子和金属锡标签种子的最终命运未知。我们发现,在田间环境中,白色塑料标签比锡标签更显着,这是金属丝标签的种子比锡丝标签的种子更容易追踪。金属丝标记种子和锡丝标记种子的平均分散距离分别为4.11±2.40 m和3.01±2.06 m,并显示出很大的差异。尽管大多数是在原地或去除后被食用的,但仍有41%的种子被保留了金属丝标签种子,远多于金属锡标签的种子。总共发现了71个用于金属丝标签种子的一级缓存(123个种子),平均和最大缓存大小分别为1.73和6。但是,只发现了三个缓存,而铁锡标签种子的缓存大小等于一个。以上数据表明,使用不同的标记方法来跟踪种子的命运有一定的不确定性。尽管它们有效地帮助通过分散种子的啮齿动物追踪种子的扩散或移动,但是在围封实验中需要充分理解不同的标记方法,包括大小,颜色和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号