首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >A comparison of macroinvertebrate-based indices for biological assessment of river health: A case example from the sub-tropical Richmond River Catchment in northeast New South Wales, Australia
【24h】

A comparison of macroinvertebrate-based indices for biological assessment of river health: A case example from the sub-tropical Richmond River Catchment in northeast New South Wales, Australia

机译:基于大型无脊椎动物的河流健康生物评估指标的比较:以澳大利亚新南威尔士州东北部的亚热带里士满河集水区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Globally, river health is deteriorating due to increased anthropogenic pressures. Accurately assessing river health is crucial for the management of river resources with macroinvertebrates commonly used as biological indicators of ecological integrity. Complex biological data is made more straightforward using indices as they offer the ability to rapidly communicate complex science in a simple form. Management decisions are often based on the results of biological river health assessments, making the identification of the most appropriate, robust and sensitive macroinvertebrate-based index vital when undertaking catchment specific assessments. Selection of a macroinvertebrate-based index should rely on a scientific method rather than arbitrary selection criteria. This study aimed to compare the performance of several macroinvertebrate-based indices to identify the index or indices most appropriate to the Richmond River Catchment (RRC) in northern New South Wales, Australia. River health within the RRC is poor with a clear pollution gradient from upper to lower catchment sites. Six commonly used indices were calculated using family-level identification. The biological assessment supported the physicochemical results with a gradient in river health from upper to lower catchment. Family Richness and Family Richness Percent were assessed as the most usable indices. In studies that have restricted time, budget and expertise they will provide accurate but limited information on river health. SIGNAL2 was identified as the most valid index for assessing river health due to its overall sensitivity to changes in river health, and level of detail on anthropogenic impacts. The poor performance of the AUSRIVAS, EPT and BCI limits or precludes their use for river health assessment in the RRC. While this model for identification and selection of an appropriate macroinvertebrate-based index for catchment scale river health assessments was useful in this context, it needs to be improved with a larger dataset and a greater environmental gradient of river health to make a less subjective evaluation.
机译:在全球范围内,由于人为压力增加,河流健康状况日趋恶化。准确评估河流健康状况对于管理河流无脊椎动物至关重要,而大型无脊椎动物通常被用作生态完整性的生物指标。使用索引可以使复杂的生物数据更直接,因为它们提供了以简单形式快速传达复杂科学的能力。管理决策通常是基于生物河流健康评估的结果,因此在进行流域特定评估时,确定最合适,最健壮和最敏感的基于无脊椎动物的指数至关重要。基于大型无脊椎动物的索引的选择应依靠科学的方法,而不是任意的选择标准。这项研究旨在比较几种基于大型无脊椎动物的指数的性能,以确定最适合澳大利亚新南威尔士州北部的里士满河集水区(RRC)的一个或多个指数。 RRC内河流健康状况较差,从上流域到下流域的污染梯度明显。使用家庭水平的鉴定计算出六个常用指标。生物学评估通过从上游到下游流域的河流健康梯度来支持理化结果。家庭财富和家庭财富百分比被认为是最有用的指标。在时间,预算和专业知识有限的研究中,他们将提供有关河流健康的准确但有限的信息。由于SIGNAL2对河流健康变化的总体敏感性以及对人为影响的详细程度,被认为是评估河流健康的最有效指标。 AUSRIVAS,EPT和BCI的不良表现限制或排除了它们在RRC中用于河流健康评估的可能性。虽然这种用于识别和选择适当的基于无脊椎动物的流域规模河流健康评估指标的模型在这种情况下很有用,但仍需要使用更大的数据集和更大的河流健康环境梯度来进行改进,以减少主观评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号