...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Bundling ecosystem services for detecting their interactions driven by large-scale vegetation restoration: enhanced services while depressed synergies
【24h】

Bundling ecosystem services for detecting their interactions driven by large-scale vegetation restoration: enhanced services while depressed synergies

机译:捆绑生态系统服务,以检测由大规模植被恢复驱动的相互作用:增强的服务,但协同效应低下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ecosystem service (ES) bundles can facilitate comprehensive understanding of the spatial configurations and interactions of multiple ESs across large-scale landscapes. They are critical for informing policy and improving ecosystem management. The spatial dimension of ES bundles has been addressed in recent research but little work has considered the temporal changes of ES bundles. This paper uses a case study in the Loess Plateau, the core area of vegetation restoration in China, to explore changes in ES spatial distributions, bundle types and multiple ES interactions in a period of rapid vegetation restoration between 2000 and 2015. Measurable proxies, biophysical indicators and the InVEST model were used to quantify 10 ESs. We found that (1) most of the ESs were improved, especially provisioning services and carbon sequestration. (2) There is a steady tradeoff between provisioning services and most regulating services, while the impacts of vegetation restoration on agricultural production were small. (3) The synergies among ESs were weakened, implying the presence of subtle functional ES interdependencies. (4) Changes in the bundling patterns between 2000 and 2015 revealed heightened gaps among ESs due to the upsurge of carbon sequestration and deterioration of the baseflow regulation. This research provides a new perspective for understanding the interactions between multiple ESs with regional vegetation restoration activities. Ecological restoration programmes play an important role in enhancing ESs, but they may also lead to expanded gaps between ESs. Baseflow regulation could be included as a key indicator to support a comprehensive understanding of the impacts of restoration interventions. The ES bundle framework is able to capture changes over time of the ES interactions across a large-scale landscape and facilitates informed ES management.
机译:生态系统服务(ES)捆绑包可以促进对大型景观中多个ES的空间配置和相互作用的全面了解。它们对于告知政策和改善生态系统管理至关重要。 ES束的空间尺寸在最近的研究中已得到解决,但很少有工作考虑ES束的时间变化。本文以中国植被恢复的核心区域黄土高原为例,探讨了2000年至2015年植被快速恢复期ES空间分布,束类型和多种ES相互作用的变化。可测量的代理,生物物理指标和InVEST模型用于量化10个ES。我们发现(1)大多数ES都得到了改进,特别是提供服务和碳封存。 (2)在提供服务和大多数调节服务之间存在一个稳定的权衡,而植被恢复对农业生产的影响很小。 (3)ES之间的协同作用减弱,表明存在功能上微妙的ES相互依赖性。 (4)2000年至2015年之间的束缚模式变化表明,由于碳固存的激增和基流调节的恶化,ES之间的差距加大了。这项研究为理解多个ES与区域植被恢复活动之间的相互作用提供了新的视角。生态恢复计划在增强生态系统中起着重要作用,但也可能导致生态系统之间的差距扩大。可以将基本流量监管作为关键指标,以支持对恢复干预措施的影响的全面了解。 ES捆绑包框架能够捕获大型环境中ES交互作用随时间的变化,并有助于进行明智的ES管理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2019年第4期|332-342|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, POB 2871, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, POB 2871, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, POB 2871, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Joint Ctr Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China;

    Working Stn Gen Soil & Water Conservat Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei, Peoples R China;

    Univ Leeds, LIDA, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England|Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecosystem service bundles; Temporal change; Synergies and trade-offs; Ecological restoration; Regional scale;

    机译:生态系统服务包;时间变化;协同作用与权衡;生态恢复;区域规模;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号