首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Development of an ecological security evaluation method based on the ecological footprint and application to a typical steppe region in China
【24h】

Development of an ecological security evaluation method based on the ecological footprint and application to a typical steppe region in China

机译:基于生态足迹的生态安全评价方法的开发及在中国典型草原地区的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The steppes of Inner Mongolia lie in a region which are sensitive to global climate change. The region forms an important ecological barrier against sandstorms and it is also strategically important for the development of China's energy and mineral resources. To describe the influence of resources exploitation on the ecological security of the typical Inner Mongolian steppe, we developed a consumption footprint pressure index (CFPI) and a production footprint pressure index (PFPI) based on the ecological footprint concept, and developed an ecological footprint contribution index (EFCI) to assess the pressures created by transferring resources and products from output areas to input areas. Using these indices, we developed a coupled ecological security assessment model to evaluate the ecological security level of the typical steppe. We used the model to calculate CFPI, PFPI, and EFCI for the steppe area for three counties and one urban region of Inner Mongolia from 2001 to 2010. We found that CFPI and PFPI increased throughout the study period in most regions. In addition, EFCI was generally positive, which indicated the ecological security of the typical steppe was affected primarily by the electricity and production output processes. Our results suggest that the ecological security of the study area has been at serious risk since 2005.
机译:内蒙古的草原位于一个对全球气候变化敏感的地区。该地区是抵御沙尘暴的重要生态屏障,对发展中国的能源和矿产资源也具有战略意义。为了描述资源开发对典型内蒙古草原生态安全的影响,我们基于生态足迹概念开发了消费足迹压力指数(CFPI)和生产足迹压力指数(PFPI),并提出了生态足迹贡献指数(EFCI),以评估资源和产品从输出区域转移到输入区域所产生的压力。利用这些指标,我们开发了一个耦合的生态安全评估模型来评估典型草原的生态安全水平。我们使用该模型计算了2001年至2010年内蒙古3个县和1个城市地区的草原面积的CFPI,PFPI和EFCI。我们发现,在整个研究期间,CFPI和PFPI在大多数区域内都在增加。此外,EFCI总体上是积极的,这表明典型草原的生态安全主要受到电力和生产输出过程的影响。我们的结果表明,自2005年以来,研究区的生态安全受到了严重威胁。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2014年第4期|153-159|共7页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

    State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecological footprint; Typical steppe; Ecological security; Evaluation method; Sustainable development;

    机译:生态足迹;典型草原生态安全;评估方法;可持续发展;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号