首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >The drawbacks and opportunities of carbon charges in metropolitan areas - A spatial general equilibrium approach
【24h】

The drawbacks and opportunities of carbon charges in metropolitan areas - A spatial general equilibrium approach

机译:大都市区碳收费的弊端和机会-空间一般均衡方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In cities there is a variety of economic and spatial forces that may influence to what extent a travel-related CO_2 emission pricing can be an effective instrument to contribute to the achievement of CO_2 reduction goals. Therefore, we examine the effectiveness and impact of CO_2 emission charges using a spatial general equilibrium model of an urban economy, calibrated according to an average German city. Our analyses suggest that the imposition of a Pigouvian type CO_2 emission charge on urban passenger travel may be able to reduce emissions by about 1%-11%, depending on the estimated social damage cost of carbon dioxide. Such a policy increases urban welfare mainly on account of a reduction of congestion costs. However, pricing congestion directly not only provides higher urban welfare but also higher emission reductions. Pricing congestion and CO_2 emissions simultaneously allows to achieve a wide range of emission reduction goals. If, however, the reduction goal is very ambitious the emission charge must be raised to higher levels. Then, distortions in the urban markets and in spatial travel decisions lower labor supply and thus urban production, income of city residents, federal tax revenue, income of landowners outside the city, all together implying losses in welfare.
机译:在城市中,各种各样的经济和空间力量可能会影响与旅行相关的CO_2排放定价能在多大程度上成为实现CO_2减排目标的有效手段。因此,我们使用根据德国平均城市进行校准的城市经济空间一般均衡模型来检验CO_2排放收费的有效性和影响。我们的分析表明,根据估算的二氧化碳对社会的破坏成本,对城市旅客出行征收Pigouvian类型的CO_2排放费可能能够减少约1%-11%的排放。这项政策主要是由于减少了拥堵成本而增加了城市福利。但是,价格拥堵不仅直接提供了更高的城市福利,而且还提供了更高的减排量。同时对拥堵和CO_2排放进行定价,可以实现各种各样的减排目标。但是,如果减排目标非常雄心勃勃,则必须将排放费提高到更高的水平。然后,城市市场和空间旅行决策中的扭曲降低了劳动力供应,从而降低了城市生产,城市居民的收入,联邦税收,城市以外的土地所有者的收入,所有这些都意味着福利的损失。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2010年第2期|p.339-357|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Technische Universitat Dresden, Faculty of Traffic Sciences "Friedrich List". Institute of Transport & Economics, Chair of Spatial Economics & Regional Science, 01062 Dresden, Germany;

    Technische Universitat Dresden, Faculty of Traffic Sciences "Friedrich List". Institute of Transport & Economics, Chair of Spatial Economics & Regional Science, 01062 Dresden, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    urban general equilibrium model; climate policy; transport policy; co_2 emissions; externalities;

    机译:城市一般均衡模型;气候政策;运输政策;二氧化碳排放量;外部性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号