...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Cost-effective Land Use Planning: Optimizing Land Use and Land Management Patterns to Maximize Social Benefits
【24h】

Cost-effective Land Use Planning: Optimizing Land Use and Land Management Patterns to Maximize Social Benefits

机译:具有成本效益的土地利用规划:优化土地利用和土地管理模式以最大程度地提高社会效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Improving water quality and other ecosystem services in agriculturally dominated watersheds is an important policy objective in many regions of the world. A major challenge is overcoming the associated costs to agricultural producers. We integrate spatially-explicit models of ecosystem processes with agricultural commodity production models to analyze the biophysical and economic consequences of alternative land use and land management patterns to achieve Total Maximum Daily Loads targets in a proto-typical agricultural watershed. We apply these models to find patterns that maximize water quality objectives for given levels of foregone agricultural profit. We find it is possible to reduce baseline watershed phosphorus loads by similar to 20% and sediment loads by similar to 18% without any reduction in agricultural profits. Our results indicate that meeting more stringent targets will result in substantial economic loss. However, when we add the social benefits from water quality improvement and carbon sequestration to private agricultural net returns we find that water quality improvements up to 50% can be obtained at no loss to societal returns. The cost of meeting water quality targets will vary over time as commodity and ecosystem service, prices fluctuate. If crop prices drop or the value of ecosystem services increase, then achieving higher water quality goals will be less costly. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在世界上许多地区,改善以农业为主的流域的水质和其他生态系统服务是一项重要的政策目标。一个主要的挑战是克服农业生产者的相关成本。我们将生态系统过程的空间显式模型与农业商品生产模型相结合,以分析替代土地利用和土地管理模式的生物物理和经济后果,从而在典型的农业流域中实现总最大日负荷目标。我们应用这些模型来寻找在给定的已获农业利润水平下最大化水质目标的模式。我们发现有可能将基准流域的磷负荷降低约20%,将沉积物负荷降低约18%,而不会降低农业利润。我们的结果表明,达到更严格的目标将导致巨大的经济损失。但是,当我们将水质改善和碳封存带来的社会效益添加到私人农业净收益中时,我们发现可以在不损失社会收益的情况下获得高达50%的水质改善。随着商品和生态系统服务价格的波动,达到水质目标的成本也会随着时间而变化。如果农作物价格下降或生态系统服务的价值增加,那么实现更高的水质目标将降低成本。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号