首页> 外文期刊>Eastern economic journal >Ethical Utilitarianism and The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Adam Smith in Relation to Hume and Bentham
【24h】

Ethical Utilitarianism and The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Adam Smith in Relation to Hume and Bentham

机译:伦理功利主义与道德情感理论:亚当·斯密与休ume与边沁的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does The Theory of Moral Sentiments reveal Adam Smith to be an "ethical utilitarian"? I approach the question by elucidating David Hume's qualifications to his own utility doctrine and the qualifications by Smith to his critique of that doctrine. I demonstrate Smith's acceptance of "happiness" as maximand, reject a narrow interpretation of the happiness entity frequently attributed to Jeremy Bentham, and confirm the role Bentham, no less than Smith and Hume, accords motivation in ethical evaluation. I conclude that the agreement amongst the three is such that to deny Smith the designation "ethical utilitarian" implies similar treatment of Hume and Bentham.
机译:道德情感理论是否表明亚当·斯密是一个“道德功利主义者”?我通过阐明大卫·休ume对他自己的效用学说的资格以及史密斯对他对该学说的批评的资格来解决这个问题。我证明史密斯对“幸福”的接受是最大的,拒绝对经常归因于杰里米·边沁的幸福实体的狭义解释,并确认边沁在伦理评价中的作用不亚于史密斯和休H。我得出的结论是,三者之间的共识是否认史密斯的“道德功利主义者”一词意味着对休ume和边沁的类似对待。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号