首页> 外文期刊>Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory >Another Modernity is Possible? The Global Justice Movement and the Transformations of Politics
【24h】

Another Modernity is Possible? The Global Justice Movement and the Transformations of Politics

机译:另一种现代性可能吗?全球正义运动与政治变革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using and expanding upon the conception of ‘successive modernities’ that has recently been developed within social theory, this article offers an interpretation of the political aims, ideas, and practices of the ‘global justice movement’ and argues that this contemporary social movement is best understood as an expression of the tensions characterizing the prevailing configuration of Western modernity in our own time. Social movements have often simultaneously challenged, changed, and sustained the institutions, norms, and habits of modern societies. Placing the global justice movement in this historical context, the author elaborates how the notion of the creative capacities of social movements has hitherto been discussed in several major theories about social movements and modernity. The article argues that the movements mobilized since the 1990s in response to issues related to globalization should neither be seen as revolts against the demise of ‘organized modernity’, nor as heralding a new type of Western modernity. Instead, the critique and political claims of the global justice movement are, according to the author, better interpreted as expressing a will to realize a ‘third modernity’ in an alternative way that stresses the values of participatory democracy, democratization of international economic institutions, and the strengthening of social equality on a global level. Thus, the movement should foremost be seen as articulating a crisis in the forms of politics and democracy during our present epoch of modernity.
机译:利用并扩展了最近在社会理论中发展起来的“成功现代性”的概念,本文对“全球正义运动”的政治目标,思想和实践进行了解释,并指出最好将这种当代社会运动理解为一种张力的表达,这种张力体现了我们时代西方现代性的主流形态。社会运动经常同时挑战,改变和维持现代社会的制度,规范和习惯。作者将全球正义运动置于这种历史背景下,阐述了迄今为止如何在关于社会运动和现代性的几种主要理论中讨论了社会运动的创造能力的概念。文章认为,自1990年代以来为应对与全球化有关的问题而动员的运动既不应被视为对“有组织的现代性”消亡的反抗,也不应被视为预示着一种新型的西方现代性。相反,根据作者的说法,对全球正义运动的批评和政治主张被更好地解释为表达以另一种方式强调实现参与式民主,国际民主化的价值观的实现“第三现代性”的意愿。经济体制,并在全球范围内加强社会平等。因此,在我们当前的现代时代,该运动应被视为以政治和民主形式阐明危机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号