...
首页> 外文期刊>Displays >Plug and play perimetry: Evaluating the use of a self-calibrating digital display for screen-based threshold perimetry
【24h】

Plug and play perimetry: Evaluating the use of a self-calibrating digital display for screen-based threshold perimetry

机译:即插即用视野检查法:评估基于屏幕阈值视野检查法的自校准数字显示器的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated the feasibility of using a 'self-calibrating' display (EIZO CG277) to perform screen-based threshold perimetry. Such displays incorporate their own integrated photometer, so could potentially be used 'straight out of the box', without the need for time-consuming and costly luminance calibration by skilled experts. Concerns remain, however, due to the fact that the internal calibration of such devices is imperfect, and lingering doubts regarding the accuracy of screen-based perimetry in general. To evaluate such a system, automated static threshold perimetry was performed in thirty-two normal-sighted adults. In one condition, participants performed a novel screen-based perimetry test, for which the screen was calibrated extensively using traditional photometric techniques/equipment. In a second condition, the same test was performed, but the display was calibrated using only the screen's integrated photometer (and assuming uniformity across the display). For reference, participants also completed a traditional visual-field assessment using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). All three tests were performed twice to assess test-retest repeatability (six tests total). The results showed no differences when comparing screen-based perimetric measurements made with internal self-calibration vs full manual calibration (either in terms of mean sensitivity, pointwise sensitivity, test-retest repeatability, or test duration). Furthermore, the accuracy and precision of both were indistinguishable from the current gold standard (HFA), although the HFA was approximately two minutes (similar to 30%) faster. These results indicate that self-calibrating commercial monitors can be used to perform screen-based perimetry almost as well as current clinical devices, and without the need for any specialized knowledge or equipment to setup or maintain. This could facilitate perimetric testing in currently hard-to-reach settings, such as community centers, stroke wards, homes, rural locations, or developing countries.
机译:这项研究评估了使用“自校准”显示器(EIZO CG277)进行基于屏幕的阈值视野检查的可行性。这样的显示器集成了它们自己的集成光度计,因此有可能“直接使用”,而无需熟练的专家进行耗时且昂贵的亮度校准。但是,由于此类设备的内部校准不完善,因此人们仍然存在担忧,并且人们普遍对基于屏幕的视野检查法的准确性存有疑虑。为了评估这种系统,对32名正常视力的成年人进行了自动静态阈值视野检查。在一种情况下,参与者进行了一种新颖的基于屏幕的视野检查测试,该屏幕使用传统的测光技术/设备进行了广泛的校准。在第二种条件下,执行了相同的测试,但是仅使用屏幕的集成光度计(并假设整个显示器均一)来校准显示器。作为参考,参与者还使用汉弗莱现场分析仪(HFA)完成了传统的视野评估。所有三个测试都进行了两次,以评估重新测试的可重复性(总共六个测试)。结果显示,将内部自校准与完全手动校准进行的基于屏幕的视野测量进行比较(在平均灵敏度,逐点灵敏度,重测重复性或测试持续时间方面)没有差异。此外,尽管HFA的速度快了大约两分钟(约30%),但两者的准确性和精确度都与当前的金标准(HFA)并没有区别。这些结果表明,自校准的商用监护仪几乎可以与当前的临床设备一样用于执行基于屏幕的视野检查,而无需任何专业知识或设备来设置或维护。这可以促进在当前难以到达的环境中进行视野测试,例如社区中心,中风病房,房屋,农村地区或发展中国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号