首页> 外文期刊>Discourse Processes >Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming?
【24h】

Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming?

机译:语言处理过程中基于话语的单词预期:预测还是引语?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Language is an intrinsically open-ended system. This fact has led to the widely shared assumption that readers and listeners do not predict upcoming words, at least not in a way that goes beyond simple priming between words. Recent evidence, however, suggests that readers and listeners do anticipate upcoming words “on the fly” as a text unfolds. In 2 event-related potentials experiments, this study examined whether these predictions are based on the exact message conveyed by the prior discourse or on simpler word-based priming mechanisms. Participants read texts that strongly supported the prediction of a specific word, mixed with non-predictive control texts that contained the same prime words. In Experiment 1A, anomalous words that replaced a highly predictable (as opposed to a non-predictable but coherent) word elicited a long-lasting positive shift, suggesting that the prior discourse had indeed led people to predict specific words. In Experiment 1B, adjectives whose suffix mismatched the predictable noun's syntactic gender elicited a short-lived late negativity in predictive stories but not in prime control stories. Taken together, these findings reveal that the conceptual basis for predicting specific upcoming words during reading is the exact message conveyed by the discourse and not the mere presence of prime words.
机译:语言是本质上开放的系统。这一事实导致了一个普遍的假设,即读者和听众不会预测即将出现的单词,至少不会超出单词之间的简单启动方式。然而,最近的证据表明,随着文本的展开,读者和听众的确会“即时”预测即将到来的单词。在2个与事件相关的电位实验中,本研究检查了这些预测是基于先前论述所传达的准确信息还是基于较简单的基于单词的启动机制。参与者阅读强烈支持特定单词预测的文本,以及包含相同素词的非预测性控制文本。在实验1A中,用异常词代替了高度可预测的词(而不是不可预测但连贯的词)引起了长期的积极转变,这表明先前的论述确实导致人们预测了特定的词。在实验1B中,后缀与可预测名词的句法性别不匹配的形容词在预测故事中引起了短暂的后期否定性,而在主要控制故事中则没有。综上,这些发现表明,在阅读过程中预测特定的即将到来的单词的概念基础是话语传达的确切信息,而不仅仅是素词的存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Discourse Processes》 |2008年第6期|464-496|共33页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands|F. C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号