首页> 外文期刊>Discourse Processes >Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out
【24h】

Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out

机译:连贯性标记,先验知识以及对信息性和说服性文本的理解:整理事物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Coherence plays a central role when readers construct meaning from a text. Previous research has shown how coherence marking affects text processing and representation. However, this effect seems to depend on reader's prior knowledge of the text content: Low knowledge readers benefit from coherence marking, whereas high knowledge readers benefit from a more implicit text (McNamara & Kintsch, 1996). Because this interaction was not consistently found in previous research, this article takes a closer look at the operationalization of the experimental variables: coherence marking, prior knowledge, and text comprehension. Also, this article compares the effect on both informative and persuasive texts. Results indicate that linguistic marking of coherence indeed interacts with prior knowledge in the informative genre, but not in the persuasive genre.
机译:当读者从文本中构造意义时,连贯性起着核心作用。先前的研究表明一致性标记如何影响文本处理和表示。但是,这种效果似乎取决于读者对文本内容的先验知识:知识水平较低的读者受益于连贯标记,而知识水平较高的读者则受益于隐含的文本(McNamara&Kintsch,1996)。由于以前的研究并未始终发现这种相互作用,因此本文将仔细研究实验变量的操作性:相干标记,先验知识和文本理解。此外,本文还比较了对信息性和说服性文本的影响。结果表明,连贯性的语言标记确实与信息类型中的先验知识相互作用,但在说服性类型中却没有。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Discourse Processes》 |2008年第4期|323-345|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University, The Netherlands;

    Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University, The Netherlands;

    Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号