【24h】

Who Killed Biafra?

机译:谁杀死了比亚夫?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stanley Diamond opens his essay with a euphoric statement by C.O. Ojukwu, the leader of Biafra, who defined Biafra’s endeavour and its relevance to pan-Africanism as the “potential of the black man ... the breaking of the chains” that would demonstrate that the “basis of neo–colonialism has been removed; which is continued economic dominance,” in 1969. This historic milestone still has not been achieved as we concur with the author who in 1970 went on to analyze the reasons for this failure within the context of the larger global frame of reference as applied to the local scene in Nigeria. Diamond’s analysis is still valid and even increasingly relevant in view of globalization, ongoing wars, and current geo-strategic and oil interests confronting our world today. The Igbo people in general and their intellectuals—including the honourees of this special issue—were all affected by the struggle over Biafra in one way or the other. The article is divided into four segments: The first part begins with the defeat of Biafra by Nigeria’s federal forces and offers an account of the Igbo people’s heroic struggle against overwhelming military and economic powers, contextualized within global strategic and business interests. Biafra was indebted to no European country for support, bought whatever supplies were available from just a few sources—some African countries, Portugal, China, and the Czech Rep., and from private companies—all with cash. Biafra largely manufactured her own arms, and received only non-political Joint Church Aid assistance. Nigeria, on the other hand was aided by both Russia (then the Soviet Union), and the North-Atlantic Alliance (particularly Nigeria’s former colonial master, Britain)—as well as by much of Moslem North Africa, with Egyptian pilots flying Russian-made MIGs against the breakaway enclave which had no air force of its own. The humanitarian disaster unfolding in Biafra where 2 million people were killed and a generation of children was starved to death was grossly ignored and understated by the world powers.
机译:斯坦利·戴蒙德(Stanley Diamond)用C.O.比阿夫拉(Biafra)领导人奥朱克乌(Ojukwu)将比阿夫拉(Biafra)的努力及其与泛非主义的关联性定义为“黑人的潜力...打破束缚”,这表明“新殖民主义的基础已被消除;这是持续的经济主导地位”。1969年,这个历史性的里程碑仍然没有实现,因为我们同意作者的观点,他在1970年继续在适用于全球经济的更大参考框架下分析了失败的原因。尼日利亚的当地风光。考虑到全球化,持续的战争以及当今世界面临的当前地缘战略和石油利益,戴蒙德的分析仍然是有效的,甚至越来越具有现实意义。总体而言,伊格博人及其知识分子,包括本期特刊的受聘者,都受到了以一种或另一种方式争夺比亚夫拉的斗争的影响。文章分为四个部分:第一部分以尼日利亚联邦部队击败比夫拉为开端,并介绍了伊博族人民与压倒一切的军事和经济力量进行的英勇斗争,这些斗争是在全球战略和商业利益的背景下进行的。 Biafra没有欠任何欧洲国家的支持,只能从一些来源(一些非洲国家,葡萄牙,中国和捷克共和国以及私营公司)购买可用的任何物资,所有这些都以现金支付。 Biafra在很大程度上制造了自己的武器,仅获得了非政治联合教会援助。另一方面,尼日利亚得到了俄罗斯(当时的苏联)和北大西洋联盟(特别是尼日利亚前殖民统治者英国)以及北非大部分穆斯林国家的帮助,埃及飞行员驾驶俄罗斯使MIG抵制了自己没有空军的脱离式飞地。世界大国完全忽略和低估了比夫拉(Biafra)的人道主义灾难,那里有200万人被杀害,一代儿童被饿死。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号