...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism >Cardiovascular risk and thiazolidinediones—what do meta-analyses really tell us?
【24h】

Cardiovascular risk and thiazolidinediones—what do meta-analyses really tell us?

机译:心血管风险和噻唑烷二酮类药物-荟萃分析真正告诉我们什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Meta-analyses of clinical trials suggest that the use of the thiazolidinedione (TZD), rosiglitazone, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may increase the risk of myocardial ischaemic events by 30–40%. Although these controversial data must be interpreted with caution, in the absence of definitive prospective cardiovascular (CV) outcomes data, they represent a prominent source of evidence concerning the CV safety of rosiglitazone. The results of meta-analyses and a large randomized-controlled CV outcomes trial provide strong evidence that pioglitazone does not increase the risk of coronary events. This article clarifies the clinical significance of these meta-analytical findings alongside other sources of evidence and assesses their impact on evolving treatment guidelines and recommendations for the use of TZDs in patients with type 2 diabetes.
机译:临床试验的荟萃分析表明,在2型糖尿病患者中使用噻唑烷二酮(TZD)罗格列酮可能会使心肌缺血事件的风险增加30-40%。尽管必须谨慎地解释这些有争议的数据,但在缺乏确切的前瞻性心血管(CV)结果数据的情况下,它们代表了有关罗格列酮CV安全性的重要证据。荟萃分析的结果和一项大型的随机对照CV结果试验提供了有力的证据,证明吡格列酮不会增加冠心病发生的风险。本文阐明了这些荟萃分析结果以及其他证据来源的临床意义,并评估了它们对不断发展的治疗指南和2型糖尿病患者使用TZD的建议的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号