...
首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Regional Financial Arrangements in the Global Financial Safety Net: The Arab Monetary Fund and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development
【24h】

Regional Financial Arrangements in the Global Financial Safety Net: The Arab Monetary Fund and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development

机译:全球金融安全网中的区域金融安排:阿拉伯货币基金组织和欧亚稳定与发展基金

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The so-called global financial safety net provides backstop insurance during financial crises. The three elements of the global safety net - the IMF, regional financial arrangements (RFAs) and bilateral swap agreements - underwent substantial changes after the global financial crisis. How have these changes influenced their use? What role do RFAs have in the safety net? This contribution addresses these questions by examining the timeliness, volume and policy conditionality of liquidity provision of each of the three elements, using a data set of 50 RFA member countries from the period 1976-2015. The article presents case studies of the Arab Monetary Fund (AMF) and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development (EFSD) to create a deeper institutional understanding of the governance mechanisms of regional funds. The authors find that today's global financial safety net produces inequalities in emergency liquidity provision. In terms of volume, RFAs improve the safety net only for small member countries - about one-third of the countries in the sample can access sufficient liquidity regionally. The experiences of AMF and EFSD demonstrate that intra-regional asymmetries of RFAs play a contradictory role: while the participation of large economies leverages liquidity provision, it simultaneously creates difficulties for the governance of the regional body.
机译:所谓的全球金融安全网在金融危机期间提供支持保险。全球安全网的三个要素-国际货币基金组织,区域金融安排(RFA)和双边互换协议-在全球金融危机之后发生了重大变化。这些变化如何影响其使用? RFA在安全网中扮演什么角色?通过使用1976-2015年期间50个RFA成员国的数据集,研究了三个要素中每个要素的及时性,数量和政策条件,从而解决了这些问题。本文介绍了阿拉伯货币基金组织(AMF)和欧亚稳定与发展基金(EFSD)的案例研究,以建立对区域基金治理机制的更深刻的制度理解。作者发现,当今的全球金融安全网在紧急流动性提供方面产生了不平等现象。就数量而言,RFAs仅改善了小成员国的安全网-样本中大约三分之一的国家可以在区域内获得足够的流动性。 AMF和EFSD的经验表明,RFA的区域内不对称性起着相互矛盾的作用:虽然大型经济体的参与利用流动性供给,但同时也给该区域机构的治理带来了困难。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2019年第1期|96-121|共26页
  • 作者单位

    Freie Univ, Inst Latin Amer Studies, Berlin, Germany;

    Freie Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Berlin, Germany;

    Freie Univ, Berlin, Germany;

    FUB, Kollegforschergrp Transformat Power Europe, Berlin, Germany;

    Freie Univ, Inst Latin Amer Studies, Dept Econ, Berlin, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号