首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Beyond the Enclave: Towards a Critical Political Economy of China and Africa
【24h】

Beyond the Enclave: Towards a Critical Political Economy of China and Africa

机译:超越飞地:走向中国和非洲的批判政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article provides a political economy framework for analysing China's engagements with Africa. It situates the rise of China in the context of the changing balance of power in the world system and particularly China's re-entry into spheres of influence in Africa that have been the purview of the former European colonial powers for two centuries or more. It begins by arguing that current approaches to China, Africa and international relations are fragmented in particular ways which prevent the development of a more critical political economy. It then examines a pervasive theme in China-Africa relations, which assumes that the Chinese work through enclaved investments to secure the resources of low-income economies, though in this sense the Chinese are no different from other investors. Where they do differ is in their bundling of aid, trade and FDI and their use of imported labour, which has been termed 'surgical colonialism'. The article does not dispute the existence of Chinese enclaves but argues that we need more empirical evidence on the levels of labour importation in relation to local labour market conditions. This requires a more nuanced understanding of state-capital dynamics in those countries where the Chinese operate although the model appears to be one of elite brokerage. However, the enclaved investments and inter-elite bargaining are only part of the story and the closing sections of the article analyse the role of independent Chinese businesses in Africa's social and political development, which moves us beyond the enclave.
机译:本文提供了一个政治经济学框架,用于分析中国与非洲的交往。它把中国的崛起置于世界体系力量平衡不断变化的背景下,特别是中国重新进入非洲势力范围,而非洲势力范围是前两个世纪以上欧洲殖民国家的职权范围。首先要论证的是,当前对中国,非洲和国际关系的态度在某些方面是分散的,从而阻碍了更为关键的政治经济的发展。然后,它考察了中非关系中普遍存在的主题,该主题假定中国人通过飞地投资来确保低收入经济体的资源,尽管从这个意义上说,中国人与其他投资者没有什么不同。他们的不同之处在于他们对援助,贸易和外国直接投资的捆绑以及对进口劳工的使用,这被称为“外科殖民主义”。这篇文章并没有对中国飞地的存在提出异议,但认为我们需要更多的经验证据来证明与当地劳动力市场状况相关的劳动力进口水平。尽管这种模式似乎是精英经纪人之一,但这需要对中国经营所在国家的州资本动态有更细微的了解。但是,飞地的投资和精英间的讨价还价只是故事的一部分,文章的结尾部分分析了中国独立企业在非洲社会和政治发展中的作用,这使我们超越了飞地。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2013年第6期|1255-1272|共18页
  • 作者

    Giles Mohan;

  • 作者单位

    UK's Open University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号