首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Social Capital and Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Burundi: The Limits of Community-based Reconstruction
【24h】

Social Capital and Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Burundi: The Limits of Community-based Reconstruction

机译:布隆迪的社会资本与冲突后重建:基于社区的重建的局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using an examination of three NGO interventions in post-conflict Burundi, this article questions community-based reconstruction as a mechanism to rebuild social capital after conflicts, particularly when direct livelihood support is provided. The authors demonstrate a general shortcoming of the methodology employed in community-based development (CBD), namely its focus on 'technical procedural design', which results in what may be termed 'supply-driven demand-driven' reconstruction. The findings suggest the need for a political economy perspective on social capital, which acknowledges that the effects on social capital are determined by the type of economic resource CBD gives access to. Through the use of a resource typology, the case studies show that the CBD methodology and the potential effects on social capital differ when applied to public and non-strategic versus private and strategic resources. This has particular consequences for post-conflict situations. A generalized application of CBD methodology to post-conflict reconstruction programmes fails to take adequate account of the nature of the interventions and the challenges posed by the particular post-conflict setting. The article therefore questions the current popular 'social engineering' approach to post-conflict reconstruction.
机译:本文通过考察冲突后布隆迪的三个非政府组织干预措施,对基于社区的重建作为冲突后重建社会资本的机制提出了质疑,特别是在提供直接生计支持时。作者展示了基于社区的开发(CBD)中使用的方法的普遍缺陷,即其对“技术程序设计”的关注,这导致了所谓的“供应驱动的需求驱动”的重建。研究结果表明,需要对社会资本采取政治经济学观点,该观点承认对社会资本的影响取决于CBD提供的经济资源类型。通过使用资源类型学,案例研究表明,当将CBD方法应用于公共和非战略资源与私人和战略资源时,其对社会资本的潜在影响是不同的。这对冲突后局势尤其有影响。在冲突后重建方案中普遍采用《生物多样性公约》方法没有充分考虑到干预措施的性质以及特定的冲突后环境所带来的挑战。因此,本文对冲突后重建当前流行的“社会工程学”方法提出了质疑。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2013年第1期|147-174|共28页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Development Policy and Management,University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium;

    Conflict Research Group at Ghent University, Universiteitstraat 8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

    Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号