首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Is Labour Still a Relevant Category for Praxis? Critical Reflections on Some Contemporary Discourses on Work and Labour in Capitalism
【24h】

Is Labour Still a Relevant Category for Praxis? Critical Reflections on Some Contemporary Discourses on Work and Labour in Capitalism

机译:劳工仍然是实践的相关类别吗?对当代资本主义关于劳动和劳动话语的批判性思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been an erosion in the use of 'labour' as a key concept of critical reflection in contemporary capitalism. Parallel to this development, there has been a significant debasement of labour rights and the concomitant rise of a discourse that delegitimizes the criticality of labour and labour rights. This essay attempts to identify and critique some of these discourses in the sphere of work, labour and labour rights. In particular, it critically examines three varied perspectives - one neoliberal and two radically opposed to that -and argues that in spite of their contrasting ideologies, they resonate with each other and, overtly or covertly, carry out the task of delegimization of a labour-centred discourse and the paradigm of labour rights. These 'radical' discourses, the essay argues, obfuscate the essence of capitalist exploitation and alienation either by an emphasis on fragmentary peculiarities immanent in the capitalist accumulation process or by the architecture of grand false constructs, which gets enmeshed within and subsumed by certain essential tendencies of contemporary capitalism. The essay argues in favour of a return to a discourse centred on labour and labour rights, albeit in a more comprehensive manner - not merely as an approach to assessing the diverse forms of working conditions and institutionalized practices, but more crucially as constituting what Marx conceptualized as the 'real abstract' in the vicissitudes of the capitalist accumulation process.
机译:使用“劳动”作为当代资本主义批判性反思的关键概念受到了侵蚀。与这一发展同时发生的是,劳工权利的严重贬低以及随之而来的剥夺了劳工和劳工权利的重要性的话语的兴起。本文试图在工作,劳工和劳工权利领域中识别和批判其中的某些论述。特别是,它批判性地考察了三种不同的观点-一种是新自由主义的观点,两种是与之完全相反的观点-并指出,尽管它们的意识形态不同,但它们彼此产生共鸣,并公开或秘密地执行了使劳动力合法化的任务-集中的话语和劳动权利的范式。文章认为,这些“激进的”话语通过强调资本主义积累过程中固有的零散特性或通过大错构筑物的结构而混淆了资本主义剥削和疏离的本质,大错构筑物被某些基本趋向所包围并包含在其中当代资本主义这篇文章主张回到以劳动和劳工权利为中心的论述,尽管是以更全面的方式进行的-不仅是一种评估各种形式的工作条件和制度化做法的方法,而且更重要的是构成了马克思概念化的内容。作为资本主义积累过程变迁中的“真正的抽象”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号