...
首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Agricultural Investment in Ethiopia: Undermining National Sovereignty or Tool for State Building?
【24h】

Agricultural Investment in Ethiopia: Undermining National Sovereignty or Tool for State Building?

机译:在埃塞俄比亚的农业投资:是损害国家主权还是国家建设的工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The media discourse on recent agricultural investments frequently referred to as the global land grab' has been quick to label these deals as neo-colonial', implying that these kinds of investments undermine national sovereignty. For the most part, the emerging academic literature on the land grab' has not critically examined this assumption. This article draws on the literature on state building and agrarian relations in Africa to construct a framework that can be used to analyse the impact of agricultural investment on state-society relations and state sovereignty. The article then uses this framework to examine the case of Ethiopia, illustrating how the Ethiopian state has directed investors to peripheral lowlands and, in doing so, has enhanced, rather than diminished, state sovereignty. As such, while the erosion of sovereignty is certainly one possible outcome of agricultural investment, it is by no means the only one, and is an assumption that should be subjected to critical analysis.
机译:媒体对近期农业投资的讨论通常被称为“全球土地抢夺”,很快就将这些交易称为“新殖民主义”,这意味着这些投资破坏了国家主权。在大多数情况下,有关“土地争夺”的新兴学术文献并未对这一假设进行严格的审查。本文利用有关非洲国家建设和农业关系的文献,构建了一个可用于分析农业投资对国家社会关系和国家主权的影响的框架。然后,本文使用此框架来检查埃塞俄比亚的案例,说明埃塞俄比亚国家如何将投资者引导到外围低地,并以此来增强而不是减少国家主权。因此,主权的侵蚀固然是农业投资的一种可能结果,但绝不是唯一的结果,这是应该接受批判性分析的一种假设。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2016年第5期|1078-1101|共24页
  • 作者

    Lavers Tom;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Manchester, Polit & Dev, Global Dev Inst, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号