首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >A nurse-led intervention to improve management of virological failure in public sector HIV clinics in Durban, South Africa: A pre- and post-implementation evaluation
【24h】

A nurse-led intervention to improve management of virological failure in public sector HIV clinics in Durban, South Africa: A pre- and post-implementation evaluation

机译:一种护士导致的干预,改善南非德班公共部门艾滋病诊所的病毒学失效管理:实施前和实施后的评估

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:Identification of patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with virological failure (VF) and the response in the public health sector remain significant challenges. We previously reported improvement in routine viral load (VL) monitoring after ART commencement through a health system-strengthening, nurse-led 'VL champion' programme as part of a multidisciplinary team in three public sector clinics in Durban, South Africa.OBJECTIVES:To report on the impact of the VL champion model adapted to identify, support and co-ordinate the management of individuals with VF on first-line ART in a setting with limited electronic-based record capacity.METHODS:We evaluated the VL champion model using a controlled before-after study design. A paper-based tool, the 'high VL register', was piloted under the supervision of the VL champion to improve data management, monitoring of counselling support, and enacting of clinical decisions. We abstracted chart and electronic data (TIER.net) for eligible individuals with VF in the year before and after implementation of the programme, and compared outcomes for individuals during these periods. Our primary outcome was successful completion of the VF pathway, defined as a repeat VL 1 000 copies/mL or a change to second-line ART within 6 months of VF. In a secondary analysis, we assessed the completion of each step in the pathway.RESULTS:We identified 60 and 56 individuals in the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods, respectively, with VF who met the inclusion criteria. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the periods. Repeat VL testing was completed in 61.7% and 57.8% of individuals in these two groups, respectively. We found no difference in the proportion achieving our primary outcome in the pre- and post-intervention periods: 11/60 (18.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9 - 28) and 15/56 (22.8%; 95% CI 15 - 38), respectively (p=0.28). In multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors, individuals in the post-intervention period had a non-significant doubling of the odds of achieving the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.07; 95% CI 0.75 - 5.72). However, there was no difference in the rates of completion of each step along the first-line VF cascade of care.CONCLUSIONS:This enhanced intervention to improve VF in the public sector using a paper-based data management system failed to achieve significant improvements in first-line VF management over the standard of care. In addition to interventions that better address patient-centred factors that contribute to VF, we believe that there are substantial limitations to and staffing requirements involved in the ongoing utilisation of a paper-based tool. A prioritisation is needed to further expand and upgrade the electronic medical record system with capabilities for prompting staff regarding patients with missed visits and critical laboratory results demonstrating VF.
机译:背景:鉴定抗逆转录病毒治疗(艺术)的病毒学失败(VF)和公共卫生部门的反应仍然存在重大挑战。我们之前通过卫生系统加强的艺术系统加强后常规病毒负荷(VL)监测的常规病毒负荷(VL)监测是在南非德班的三个公共部门诊所的多学科团队的一部分。目的:到报告旨在识别,支持和协调在第一线艺术中识别,支持和协调个人在具有有限的电子记录能力的环境中对个人的影响。方法:我们使用A评估了VL冠军模型在学习设计前进行控制。基于纸质工具,“高VL寄存器”是在VL冠军的监督下试驾,以改善数据管理,监测咨询支持,并颁布临床决策。我们在执行该计划前后的VF的符合条件的符合条件的图表和电子数据(Tier.Net),以及在这些时期内的个人比较了个体的结果。我们的主要结果是成功完成VF途径,定义为重复VL&在vf的6个月内为第二线艺术的变更。在次要分析中,我们评估了途径中每一步的完成。结果:我们分别在符合纳入标准的VF中确定了60和56个个人。期间之间的社会血目和临床特征在于相似。重复VL测试分别在这两组的61.7%和57.8%的人中完成。我们发现在预干预前期和后期后期的主要结果的比例没有区别:11/60(18.3%; 95%置信区间(CI)9 - 28)和15/56(22.8%; 95%CI)分别为15 - 38)(P = 0.28)。在调整潜在混淆因素的多变量逻辑回归模型中,干预后期的个体在实现主要结果的几率下具有非显着加倍(调整后的赔率比2.07; 95%CI 0.75 - 5.72)。然而,沿着一线VF级联的每个步骤的完成率没有差异。结论:这种增强的干预在公共部门中使用基于纸张的数据管理系统改善VF的干预未能实现显着的改进优先级的第一线VF管理。除了更好地解决患者为VF的患者为中心因素的干预措施之外,我们认为,在纸质工具的持续利用中涉及涉及的实质性局限性和人员配置要求。需要优先级,以进一步扩展和升级电子医疗系统,以促使员工有关错过的访问和展示VF的关键实验室结果的员工。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号