首页> 外文期刊>Genealogy >‘Vindictiveness on Account of Colour’?: Race, Gender, and Class at the English Divorce Court, 1872–1939
【24h】

‘Vindictiveness on Account of Colour’?: Race, Gender, and Class at the English Divorce Court, 1872–1939

机译:'守财心陈述颜色':比赛,性别和课程在英国离婚法院,1872-1939

获取原文
           

摘要

This article uses 116 divorce or separation cases involving people of color between 1872 and 1940 to interrogate the role of the state in adjudicating racially mixed marriages in Britain. These examples demonstrate the rising population of imperial subjects within the U.K., but also that marital cases could reverse in-migration, due to embarrassment and expense for all parties. In addition, gender and class factors limited the impact of race in the court. Men’s advantages in bringing cases overcame some racial prejudices, and rich men, whatever their color, could hire effective representation. Race only impacted divorce cases when women could play on stereotypes of violent men, or when men of color were co-respondents and thus broke up homes. Still, the number of undefended cases limited the influence of race in most divorce suits.
机译:本文使用116个离婚或分离案件,涉及1872年至1940年之间的颜色人士,审查国家在裁决中英国种族混合婚姻中的作用。 这些例子展示了U.K的帝国科目群体的上升。 此外,性别和班级因素限制了比赛在法庭上的影响。 男人在带来案件的优势越来越多的种族偏见,富裕的人,无论他们的颜色如何,都可以雇用有效的代表。 只有受影响的离婚案件才能在暴力男性的刻板印象上发挥作用,或者当颜色的男人是合作者,因此打破了家园。 尽管如此,未修案案件的数量限制了比赛在大多数离婚诉讼中的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号