...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease. >Tocilizumab in refractory Caucasian Takayasu’s arteritis: a multicenter study of 54 patients and literature review
【24h】

Tocilizumab in refractory Caucasian Takayasu’s arteritis: a multicenter study of 54 patients and literature review

机译:在难治性白种人高级动脉炎中的康斯之耳宫:54名患者的多中心研究和文献综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in Caucasian patients with refractory Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK) in clinical practice. Methods: A multicenter study of Caucasian patients with refractory TAK who received TCZ. The outcome variables were remission, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, improvement in imaging techniques, and adverse events. A comparative study between patients who received TCZ as monotherapy (TCZ MONO ) and combined with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (TCZ COMBO ) was performed. Results: The study comprised 54 patients (46 women/8 men) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 42.0 (32.5–50.5) years. TCZ was started after a median (IQR) of 12.0 (3.0–31.5) months since TAK diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 12/54 (22.2%), 19/49 (38.8%), 23/44 (52.3%), and 27/36 (75%) patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12?months, respectively. The prednisone dose was reduced from 30.0 mg/day (12.5–50.0) to 5.0 (0.0–5.6) mg/day at 12?months. An improvement in imaging findings was reported in 28 (73.7%) patients after a median (IQR) of 9.0 (6.0–14.0) months. Twenty-three (42.6%) patients were on TCZ MONO and 31 (57.4%) on TCZ COMBO : MTX ( n?=?28), cyclosporine A ( n?=?2), azathioprine ( n?=?1). Patients on TCZ COMBO were younger [38.0 (27.0–46.0) versus 45.0 (38.0–57.0)] years; difference (diff) [95% confidence interval (CI)?=?-7.0 (-17.9, -0.56] with a trend to longer TAK duration [21.0 (6.0–38.0) versus 6.0 (1.0–23.0)] months; diff 95% CI?=?15 (-8.9, 35.5), and higher c-reactive protein [2.4 (0.7–5.6) versus 1.3 (0.3–3.3)] mg/dl; diff 95% CI?=?1.1 (-0.26, 2.99). Despite these differences, similar outcomes were observed in both groups (log rank p?=?0.862). Relevant adverse events were reported in six (11.1%) patients, but only three developed severe events that required TCZ withdrawal. Conclusion: TCZ in monotherapy, or combined with cDMARDs, is effective and safe in patients with refractory TAK of Caucasian origin.
机译:目的:评估临床实践中难治性Takayasu难治性动脉炎(TAD)中白种人患者幼稚患者(TCZ)的疗效和安全性。方法:对收到TCZ的难治性TAD的多中心研究。结果变量是缓解,糖皮质激素效果,成像技术的改善和不良事件。进行接受TCZ作为单药治疗(TCZ单体)并将常规疾病改性抗风湿药物(CDMARD)(TCZ组合)的患者进行比较研究。结果:该研究包括54名患者(46名妇女/ 8名男子),中位数[四分位数(IQR)]年龄为42.0岁(32.5-50.5)年。 TCZ在达达诊断以来的12.0(3.0-31.5)个月的中位数(IQR)之后。在12/54(22.2%),19/49(38.8%),23/44(52.3%)和27/36(75%)分别分别为1,3,6和12个月的27/44(52.3%)和27/36(75%)的缓解。泼尼松剂量从30.0mg /天(12.5-50.0)减少到5.0(0.0-5.6)mg /天,12个月。在9.0(IQR)的中位数(6.0-14.0)个月后,在28例(73.7%)患者中报告了成像结果的改善。在TCZ组合的TCZ Mono和31(57.4%)上进行二十三(42.6%):MTX(N?=Δ28),环孢菌素A(n?=Δ2),偶氮唑(n?=Δ1)。 TCZ组合的患者年轻[38.0(27.0-46.0)与45.0(38.0-57.0)]岁;差异(差异)[95%置信区间(CI)吗?=? - 7.0(-17.9,-0.56]趋势持续时间持续时间[21.0(6.0-38.0)与6.0(1.0-23.0)]月份;差异95 %ci?=α=α= 15(-8.9,35.5),更高的c-反应蛋白[2.4(0.7-5.6)与1.3(0.3-3.3)] mg / dl;差异95%ci?=?1.1(-0.26, 2.99)。尽管存在这些差异,但在两组中观察到类似的结果(对数排名P?= 0.862)。六(11.1%)患者中报告了相关不良事件,但只有三个突发的严重事件需要TCZ撤离。结论:结论:结论:结论:单药治疗中的TCZ,或与CDMARD结合,在高加索人的难治性TAK患者中是有效和安全的。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号