...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >COVID-19 false dichotomies and a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding public health, COVID-19 symptomatology, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mask wearing, and reinfection
【24h】

COVID-19 false dichotomies and a comprehensive review of the evidence regarding public health, COVID-19 symptomatology, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mask wearing, and reinfection

机译:Covid-19虚假二分法以及对公共卫生,Covid-19症状学,SARS-COV-2传输,面膜穿着和重新感染的证据综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Scientists across disciplines, policymakers, and journalists have voiced frustration at the unprecedented polarization and misinformation around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Several false dichotomies have been used to polarize debates while oversimplifying complex issues. In this comprehensive narrative review, we deconstruct six common COVID-19 false dichotomies, address the evidence on these topics, identify insights relevant to effective pandemic responses, and highlight knowledge gaps and uncertainties. The topics of this review are: 1) Health and lives vs. economy and livelihoods, 2) Indefinite lockdown vs. unlimited reopening, 3) Symptomatic vs. asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, 4) Droplet vs. aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, 5) Masks for all vs. no masking, and 6) SARS-CoV-2 reinfection vs. no reinfection. We discuss the importance of multidisciplinary integration (health, social, and physical sciences), multilayered approaches to reducing risk (“Emmentaler cheese model”), harm reduction, smart masking, relaxation of interventions, and context-sensitive policymaking for COVID-19 response plans. We also address the challenges in understanding the broad clinical presentation of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. These key issues of science and public health policy have been presented as false dichotomies during the pandemic. However, they are hardly binary, simple, or uniform, and therefore should not be framed as polar extremes. We urge a nuanced understanding of the science and caution against black-or-white messaging, all-or-nothing guidance, and one-size-fits-all approaches. There is a need for meaningful public health communication and science-informed policies that recognize shades of gray, uncertainties, local context, and social determinants of health.
机译:跨学科,政策制定者和记者的科学家对2019年(Covid-19)大流行的前所未有的极化和错误信息具有浊音。在过度简化的复杂问题的同时,已经使用了几种虚假二分法来偏离辩论。在这一全面的叙述审查中,我们解构了六个普通的Covid-19错误二分法,解决了这些主题的证据,确定了与有效的大流行反应相关的见解,并突出了知识差距和不确定性。本评价的主题是:1)健康与生活与经济和生计,2)无限锁定与无限重复,3)症状与无症状严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)感染,4)所有与掩模的SARS-COV-2,5)液滴与气溶胶传播SARS-COV-2,5)掩模,6)SARS-COV-2 Reinfection与无Reinfection。我们讨论多学科整合(健康,社会和物理学)的重要性,减少风险的多层方法(“优势奶酪模型”),减少减少,智能掩蔽,休息放松,以及对Covid-19反应的背景敏感的决策制作计划。我们还解决了了解Covid-19,SARS-COV-2传输和SARS-COV-2 Reinfection的广泛临床介绍的挑战。这些科学和公共卫生政策的关键问题已被呈现为大流行期间的错误二分法。然而,它们几乎没有二进制,简单或均匀,因此不应被诬陷为极极极端。我们敦促对科学,谨慎对抗黑色或黑色消息传递,全无或概要的所有方法进行谨慎的理解。需要有意义的公共卫生沟通和识别灰色,不确定性,当地背景和健康的社会决定因素的阴影。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号