...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Epidural Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with that of Epidural Ropivacaine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries- A Randomised Double-Blinded Stud
【24h】

Epidural Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with that of Epidural Ropivacaine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries- A Randomised Double-Blinded Stud

机译:硬膜外罗哌卡因和右甲丙粉与硬膜外罗哌卡因和芬太尼术术后镇痛术术后骨折 - 一种随机双盲螺柱

获取原文
           

摘要

Epidural with opioids as adjuvants are the most common agents of choice for postoperative analgesia in spine surgeries which promote early ambulation, increased patient satisfaction and improved outcome. Recently, epidural administration of alpha-2 (α2 ) agonists in combination with local anaesthetics in low doses offers new dimensions in the management of postoperative pain.Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy, sedation score and haemodynamic stability of Epidural Ropivacaine and Fentanyl (RF) with that of Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine (RD) in the postoperative period in lumbar spine surgeries.Materials and Methods: This was a randomised, double-blinded study conducted on 60 patients at IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Khordha, India. Haemodynamic parameters, Visual Analogue Score (VAS), sedation score, time to 1st dose of rescue analgesics requirement and complications were observed. The study consisted of group RF that received ropivacaine and fentanyl and group RD that received ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine, with 30 patients in each group. Continuous variables were analysed with the unpaired t-test and categorical variables were analysed with Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test. Statistical significance was taken as p <0.05Results: The mean age of participants in group RD was 39.73±7.192 years and in group RF was 40.67±7.434 years (p-value 0.872). Heart rate was in lower range in RD group throughout the study and was statistically significant with a p-value <0.05. VAS score was lower, sedation score was higher and time to 1st dose of rescue analgesia were longer in RD group compared to group RF (p<0.005). Complications like hypotension (33.3%), bradycardia (20%) were more common in group RD while nausea, vomiting (16.67%) and pruritis (10%) were noted in group RF.Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine seems to be a better neuraxial adjuvant with good postoperative analgesic efficacy, better patient comfort and haemodynamic stability compared with that of fentanyl.
机译:与阿片类药物作为佐剂是术后镇痛的最常见的代理,脊柱手术中促进早期救护,提高患者满意度和改善的结果。最近,α-2(α2)激酶施用与低剂量的局部麻醉剂组合在术后止痛药中提供了新的尺寸:用于比较硬膜外罗哌卡因和芬太尼的镇痛效果,镇静评分和血流动力学稳定性(RF腰椎脊柱手术术后时期的Ropivacaine和Dexmedetomidine(RD)的目的是,这是在IMS和Sum Hospital,Bhoucheswar,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Khordha,Indial的一项随机分配的双盲研究。血液动力学参数,视觉模拟分数(VAS),镇静分数,观察到救援镇痛药物需求和并发症的时间。该研究由RF组,接受Ropivacaine和Fentanyl和Grous Rd,该研究罗哌卡因和右甲酰甲基咪啶,每组30名患者。用诸如Chi-Square测试和Fisher精确测试分析了不配对的T检验和分类变量的连续变量。统计学显着性作为P <0.05结果:群体参与者的平均年龄为39.73±7.192岁,RF组为40.67±7.434岁(P值0.872)。在整个研究中,RD组中的心率在较低范围内,并且具有P值<0.05的统计学意义。 VAS得分较低,镇静评分较高,与第RF群(P <0.005)相比,RD组中的救援镇痛的时间较长。在RF的恶心,呕吐(16.67%)和瘙痒(16.67%)和瘙痒症组中,Bradycardia(20%)等并发症在rf.Conclusive中注意到恶心,呕吐(16.67%)和瘙痒症(10%)似乎是一种更好的神经佐剂与芬太尼相比,术后镇痛功效,更好的患者舒适性和血液动力学稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号