首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Military and Strategic Studies >THIRD PRIZE: The Archaic Greek Way of War: Reassessing Martial Identities
【24h】

THIRD PRIZE: The Archaic Greek Way of War: Reassessing Martial Identities

机译:三等奖:Archaic希腊战争方式:重新评估武侠身份

获取原文
           

摘要

Recently, classical scholarship has had to revisit a once-settled debate: the hoplite revolution and adoption of phalanx combat. The hoplite-exclusive phalanx, which needed cohesion, mass, and level terrain to most effectively operate is known to have become the standard form of Greek warfare in the Classical period. However, precisely when the shift was made from the fluid form of combat we see portrayed in Homeric epic to phalanx combat remains an unsettled topic in the history of Archaic Greece (ca. 650-480 BCE). Much as Peter Krentz, Hans Van Wees, and others have pointed out in their work over the past decade, there are several issues with what had over time become the established beliefs around this topic. This has rekindled long-standing debates once settled, revolving around competing theories on when the hoplite panoply, and phalanx formation itself, became standard practice among the Greek city states.
机译:最近,古典奖学金必须重新审视一项曾经结算的辩论:跳跃革命和采用兰那斯战斗。 已知最有效地运作凝聚力,质量和水平地形的跳跃型专属的Phalanx已成为古典时期希腊战争的标准形式。 然而,正是当换流的变化是由战斗的流体形式制作时,我们看到在众同体史诗中描绘给Phalanx作战仍然是古代希腊历史上的令人不安的话题(约650-480 BCE)。 像彼得克伦茨一样,汉斯范薇和其他人在过去十年中指出,随着时间的推移成为这个话题的既定信念存在几个问题。 这使得长期辩论曾经定居,围绕竞争理论循环,当跳跃的跳跃的竞争理论,以及Phalanx的形成本身,成为希腊城市中的标准做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号