...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) >Measurement and Evaluation of Collaborative Development Level of Higher Education
【24h】

Measurement and Evaluation of Collaborative Development Level of Higher Education

机译:高等教育协同发展水平的测量与评价

获取原文
           

摘要

With the aid of grey correlation theory and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), this paper sets up a multi-dimensional evaluation index system (EIS) for the comprehensive development level (CDL) of China’s higher education, and quantifies the state of collaborative development in 2005-2017 with an improved distance collaboration model. The results show that: Being the premises and bases of higher education, the supply subsystem develops much slower than the other subsystems (i.e. participation, output, and environment), and clearly pulls the development of the other subsystems. From 2012 onwards, the subsystems conformed to basically the same trend for the degree of collaboration: the degree of collaboration tended to be stable. There was even a slight dent in overall degree of collaboration between 2012 and 2016. Hence, the overall degree of collaborative development was far slower than the overall degree of development. After more than a decade of development, the degree of development, degree of collaboration, and degree of collaborative development reached basically the same level in 2017. The empirical results shed new lights on the focal points of higher education development in China.
机译:借助于灰色相关理论和技术的优先顺序与理想解决方案(TOPSIS),为中国高等教育的综合发展水平(CDL)制定了多维评估指标体系(EIS),通过改进的距离协作模型来量化2005 - 2017年的协同发展状态。结果表明:作为高等教育的场所和基础,供应子系统发展比其他子系统更慢(即参与,产出和环境),并清楚地拉动其他子系统的发展。从2012年开始,子系统符合合作程度基本相同的趋势:合作程度趋于稳定。 2012年至2016年间,甚至在整体合作程度方面甚至略有凹陷。因此,合作发展的整体程度远远慢于整体发展程度。经过十多年的发展,发展程度,协作程度和协作发展程度基本相同的水平在2017年。实证结果揭示了中国高等教育发展焦点的新灯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号