首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Chinese Herbal Formula Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi Decoction Compared With Leflunomide in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study
【24h】

Chinese Herbal Formula Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi Decoction Compared With Leflunomide in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study

机译:中国草药配方华宇 - 羌申 - 桐比汤与甲基丙胺胺与甲氨蝶呤联合患者,患者有活性类风湿性关节炎:开放标签,随机,控制,试点研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Traditional Chinese Medicine is complementary and an alternative to modern medicine. The combination therapies of herbal products with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are gradually and widely adopted in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Huayu-Qiangshen-Tongbi (HQT) decoction, a Chinese medicine formula, combined with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of patients with active RA, in comparison with the combination therapy of MTX with leflunomide (LEF). Methods: This pilot study was a monocenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. Ninety patients with active RA were randomly allocated to receive either HQT at a dose of 250 ml twice daily or LEF at a dose of 20 mg once daily, and all participants received MTX at a dose of 10–15 mg once weekly. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) after a 24-week treatment. Results: 84.4% (76/90) patients completed the 24-week observation. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage values of patients achieving the ACR20 response criteria were 72.1% (31/43) in MTX + HQT group and 74.4% (32/43) in MTX + LEF group ( p = 0.808). No significant difference was observed in other parameters, including ACR50, ACR70, clinical disease activity index good responses, European League Against Rheumatism good response, remission rate, and low disease activity rate. The results of the per-protocol analysis showed consistency with those of the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean change from baseline at week 24 for the van der Heijde modified total sharp score had no significant difference between two groups (3.59 ± 4.75 and 1.34 ± 8.67 in the MTX + HQT group and MTX + LEF group, respectively, p = 0.613). The frequency of adverse events was similar in both groups (11 cases in the MTX + HQT and 17 cases in the MTX + LEF, p 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with active RA, treatment with the combination of HQT and MTX was associated with improvement in signs, symptoms, and physical function. With a beneficial clinical response and acceptable tolerability, HQT or other Chinese medicine formula may be a good therapeutic option in combination with MTX for RA treatment. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trails Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16009031, Registered on 15th August 2016, http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx .
机译:背景:中药是互补的,也是现代医学的替代品。在中国类风湿性关节炎(RA)的管理中逐渐和广泛地采用了疾病改性抗风湿药物的草药产品的组合疗法。目的:为了评估华宇 - 羌申 - 汤(HQT)汤剂的疗效和安全性,中药配方,与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合治疗活性RA患者,与Leflunomide的MTX联合治疗相比( lef)。方法:该试点研究是单社会,开放标签,随机对照试验,具有两个平行武器。随机分配90例活性RA,每天两次以250毫升的剂量或每日剂量的剂量的剂量接收HQT,所有参与者每周服用10-15毫克的剂量接受MTX。初级疗效终点是在24周治疗后,在美国风湿病学标准(ACR20)改善的患者的比例。结果:84.4%(76/90)患者完成了24周的观察。在意向治疗分析中,达到ACR20响应标准的患者的百分比值为MTX + HQT基团的72.1%(31/43),74.4%(32/43)在MTX + LEF组中(P = 0.808) 。在其他参数中没有观察到显着差异,包括ACR50,ACR70,临床疾病活动指数良好的反应,欧洲联盟免受风湿病的良好反应,缓解率和低疾病活动率。每协议分析的结果显示与意图分析的分析一致。在WAN DER Heijde修改总急剧评数的第24周的平均变化在两组之间没有显着差异(3.59±4.75和1.34±8.67,分别在MTX + HQT组和MTX + LEF组中,P = 0.613) 。两组不良事件的频率相似(MTX + HQT中11例,MTX + LEF中的17例,P> 0.05)。结论:在活性RA患者中,HQT和MTX组合的治疗与症状,症状和物理功能的改善有关。具有有益的临床反应和可接受的耐受性,HQT或其他中药式可以是良好的治疗选择,与MTX组合用于RA处理。审判注册:中国临床轨迹登记处,CHICTR-INR-16009031,2016年8月15日注册,http://www.chictr.org.cn/enindex.aspx。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号